
Is Metro getting a pass on the derailment Friday?
Several sources tell me they think Metro should have had speed restrictions in place long before that train derailed at 4:45.
"The extreme heat has been going on pretty much all month," said one. "Why did it take a derailment to wake someone up?"
Another said "Last year, Metro had all trains slow down during the heat wave. I guess they forgot to this year. Oops."
A scan of past Metro press releases shows it has instituted speed restrictions as a preventative measure during previous extreme heat and did so well before rush hour. (Here. Here.) Metro has even instituted speed restrictions for fallen leaves.
What happened this time around? The temperature has been over 95 for most of the month.
Luckily, no one was injured, and again, Metro dodged a bullet.
Metro will likely keep gambling as long as they're allowed to get away with it by our local politicians and press.
But our local politicians and the press are capable of dishing out strongly worded and deserved scorn for area organizations that continue to fail their customers.
Take Pepco, which was slow to restore power after the big storms that hit June 29.
DC mayor Vincent Gray said he was "fed up" with Pepco. DC councilwoman Mary Cheh called for a probe of Pepco. Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett called Pepco's timetable for restoring power "unacceptable.'
Even the PR man's favorite newspaper, the Washington Post ran an editorial, saying:
We single out Pepco not only because of its sluggish response after the recent storm — and its inexcusably spotty communications — but also because of its woeful record in maintaining and restoring service following earlier storms.Maryland State Sen. James C. Rosapepe blasted Pepco, saying:
It's no longer an excuse for the utilities to say that we are shocked, shocked, shocked that the wind blew hard, or that it rained a lot or that it snowed for three days. It's unpredictable what weather event will take place on what day, but it is more predictable that we will continue to have them.Sounds like the Post and Rosapepe could have been talking about another, failing and completely reactive, organization we all know too well.
Ironically, about the only love for Pepco came from, of all places, Metro!
Metro's dysfunction is on a par, if not worse, than Pepco's, but somehow, despite dangerous failure after dangerous failure over a course of years, Metro continues to skate by with little or no criticism from some of the institutions and people that might actually be able to bring about the kind of real change those of us who ride regularly know Metro needs so badly.
Other items:
Dulles rail board spends big on travel (Examiner)
OL Rider · 663 weeks ago
Possible reasons:
Secondary traffic effects from people driving instead of WMATA -- too complicated for politician to grasp effect. And politicians are often wealthy enough to live relatively close to job.
Voters -- yeah right. Very few people vote on WMATA as an issue, and the politicians know that. In fact, the ones that would vote on WMATA as an issue are likely the members of the local ATU, who push WMATA backwards.
234 · 663 weeks ago
jimlcunningham 80p · 663 weeks ago
Anon · 663 weeks ago
Will · 663 weeks ago
Anon · 663 weeks ago
Davin Peterson · 663 weeks ago
CSX, who owns the rails that Amtrak, Commuter Rail MARC & VRE trains operate on always implements heat restrictions of 40 MPH when the temperature gets to 90. This way if the engineer (driver) sees a track problem ahead, they can stop in time to prevent an accident. Back in 1992, an Amtrak train derailed because of a heat kink.
@TheHornGuy · 663 weeks ago
@VeggieTart · 663 weeks ago
*sigh* Why Metro can't institute an automatic policy that when the temperature is above 95 degrees (a number I picked arbitrarily), the following occurs: 1) reduced speed on above-ground tracks due to the likelihood of rails warping in the heat (something that apparently is not unique to Metro) and 2) suspension of the law that forbids food and drink to allow for bottled water only.
Oh, yeah, because it would make SENSE, that's why.
And it seems no matter how much scorn is heaped on Metro, unless huge changes are made from within, they'll keep doing the same thing and keep letting the criticism roll off their backs.
BTW, Pepco: Try burying the lines. Sure it's expensive, but think of the money that will be saved in not having to call in out-of-state contractors every time a storm knocks trees into power lines. Heck, if you can find a way for it to coincide with other work going on in the area, that's a win for both. I live in DC and really, really appreciate having buried power lines every time a story like this comes out.
Enoch Emery · 663 weeks ago
Pepco’s rough estimate is that it would cost almost $4 billion to put all the lines in DC underground. Over 30 years, it would cost every DC customer an additional $50-$100 per month every month.
Jason · 663 weeks ago
n2deep · 663 weeks ago
Will · 663 weeks ago
Matt G · 663 weeks ago
Enoch Emery · 663 weeks ago
But hey, if you'd rather pay an extra $50 per month (conservative estimate) every month for 30 years... go for it. I doubt many people who have the facts will be with you on that.
Red Line Rider · 663 weeks ago
I'd be curious to see what sort of information, if any, could be uncovered. But then again, perhaps WMATA would just ignore the request and pretend like it never happened. WMATA hasn't pulled shenanigans like that before, right?
John · 663 weeks ago
And GGW is an outlet that generally goes rather easy on metro...
@CENOLITHIC · 663 weeks ago
From the FOIA.gov website: "Enacted in 1966, and taking effect on July 5, 1967, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) provides that any person has a right, enforceable in court, to obtain access to federal agency records, except to the extent that such records (or portions of them) are protected from public disclosure by one of nine exemptions or by one of three special law enforcement record exclusions."
"Any person" does not equal "any media outlet."
@ChrisHowdy · 663 weeks ago
This is all part of the bigger issue of Metro being a public entity when it suits them -- i.e., begging state/District/federal governments for money -- and a private (or "quasi-public") entity when it doesn't, like when they're the target of lawsuits.
unsuckdcmetro 92p · 663 weeks ago
It takes them months and months to respond, and if the response is complete and makes sense (rare), the news peg has long passed for whatever it was you asked about in the first place.
I know my frustrations about this are shared by the Examiner and Times. I have no idea what the Post's experience has been, but based on their Metro "coverage," it has been a while since they PARPed anything.
Guest · 663 weeks ago
John · 663 weeks ago
http://live.washingtonpost.com/gridlock-0723.html
Also, we should all contact the Ombudsman of the Washington Post and let the criticism of Dr. Gridlock and the Transportation team be heard. The coverage is unacceptable.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/patrick-b-pexton/20...
jkuchen · 663 weeks ago
John · 663 weeks ago
John · 663 weeks ago
Please contact the ombudsman. Get the ball rolling. We need better coverage from the Post.
The Anti-TB Guy · 663 weeks ago
"If there's something about Metro riders that bothers me, it's that many who complain seem unwilling to act on their complaints. If riding Metro is intolerable, they should either become politically active in fixing the problems or find alternative forms of transportation that leave them feeling less abused. That might involve driving, but it might also involve biking or walking."
Ref: http://live.washingtonpost.com/gridlock-0709.html...
anon · 663 weeks ago
"Dear Idiot Boy,
You say people seem unwilling to act on their complaints. It may surprise you to learn that *GOING TO THE PRESS* has been a valid way of acting on one's dissatisfaction with government or private companies for centuries. You. Are. The. Press. Act like it. Stop insulting us.
Secondly, although you pose biking and walking as viable alternative forms of transportation, your suggestion is utterly laughable. Yes, many people bike to and from work, and more power to them. However, it is both unreasonable and unconscionable to expect anyone who is even a little unhappy with the staggering lack of safety concerns at Metro to be able to do either of these things, for two glaringly obvious reasons: 1) Many people by necessity commute long distances into DC and can't walk/bike that far every day, five days a week, and 2) with the temperature - even without the heat index - routinely over 90 degrees every day, walking or biking can, for many, be a very dangerous choice. You should be embarrassed to be suggesting either as a viable alternative to paid-for public transportation."
woodstock · 663 weeks ago
@ChrisHowdy · 663 weeks ago
guest · 663 weeks ago
re: John's post above: very good idea; did anyone else see his response to the "rider revolt" in sunday's paper? (--which, of course, i can't find on the website.) basically soft pedaled the dozens of emails/tweets/posts etc which asserted it wasn't a "revolt" at all. frankly i'm surprised he printed it....
FedUp · 663 weeks ago
Frequent red liner · 663 weeks ago
dddddda · 663 weeks ago
guest · 663 weeks ago
16 cents · 663 weeks ago
Cyclone · 663 weeks ago
I will say that during this past 'heat wave' I was expecting to see a whole lot of 'AC broken' on Metro cars. What happend there? I though that the AC only worked on Metro during Fall, Winter, and Spring.
guest · 663 weeks ago
bll · 663 weeks ago
guest · 663 weeks ago
MDScot · 663 weeks ago
Also amazing is this from the NTSB " The National Transportation Safety Board often conducts its own investigations after a derailment, but NTSB spokesman Keith Holloway said that because there were no fatalities and there is a relatively clear idea of what happened, “it doesn’t really merit an NTSB investigation at this point.”
Translated - we will wait until some dies to care
Anon · 663 weeks ago
anon · 663 weeks ago
dddd · 663 weeks ago
Fixed that for ya......
Matt · 663 weeks ago
n2deep · 663 weeks ago
Ryan · 663 weeks ago
guest · 663 weeks ago
Matt · 663 weeks ago
So I guess it is less likely that the train will end up in the Potomac or on the beltway. However, it would certainly not help the evacuation and response.
Stan Dessel · 663 weeks ago
P.S. Please recommend us to all your sucker DC tourist friends visiting this summer! And thanks for your compliance to our lattest fare hike, aka robbing our full fare paying riders. (and we will catch all of you tailgaters!)
EJC · 663 weeks ago
Fran · 662 weeks ago