Monday, July 9, 2012

Where's the Scorn for Metro?


Is Metro getting a pass on the derailment Friday?

Several sources tell me they think Metro should have had speed restrictions in place long before that train derailed at 4:45.

"The extreme heat has been going on pretty much all month," said one. "Why did it take a derailment to wake someone up?"

Another said "Last year, Metro had all trains slow down during the heat wave. I guess they forgot to this year. Oops."

A scan of past Metro press releases shows it has instituted speed restrictions as a preventative measure during previous extreme heat and did so well before rush hour. (Here. Here.) Metro has even instituted speed restrictions for fallen leaves.

What happened this time around? The temperature has been over 95 for most of the month.

Luckily, no one was injured, and again, Metro dodged a bullet.

Metro will likely keep gambling as long as they're allowed to get away with it by our local politicians and press.

But our local politicians and the press are capable of dishing out strongly worded and deserved scorn for area organizations that continue to fail their customers.

Take Pepco, which was slow to restore power after the big storms that hit June 29.

DC mayor Vincent Gray said he was "fed up" with Pepco. DC councilwoman Mary Cheh called for a probe of Pepco. Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett called Pepco's timetable for restoring power "unacceptable.'

Even the PR man's favorite newspaper, the Washington Post ran an editorial, saying:
We single out Pepco not only because of its sluggish response after the recent storm — and its inexcusably spotty communications — but also because of its woeful record in maintaining and restoring service following earlier storms.
Maryland State Sen. James C. Rosapepe blasted Pepco, saying:
It's no longer an excuse for the utilities to say that we are shocked, shocked, shocked that the wind blew hard, or that it rained a lot or that it snowed for three days. It's unpredictable what weather event will take place on what day, but it is more predictable that we will continue to have them.
Sounds like the Post and Rosapepe could have been talking about another, failing and completely reactive, organization we all know too well.

Ironically, about the only love for Pepco came from, of all places, Metro!

Metro's dysfunction is on a par, if not worse, than Pepco's, but somehow, despite dangerous failure after dangerous failure over a course of years, Metro continues to skate by with little or no criticism from some of the institutions and people that might actually be able to bring about the kind of real change those of us who ride regularly know Metro needs so badly.

Other items:
Dulles rail board spends big on travel (Examiner)

Comments (51)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
OL Rider's avatar

OL Rider · 663 weeks ago

Everyone uses PEPCO, including the politicians. The politicians don't ride Metro. Why then should the politicians care about Metro?

Possible reasons:

Secondary traffic effects from people driving instead of WMATA -- too complicated for politician to grasp effect. And politicians are often wealthy enough to live relatively close to job.

Voters -- yeah right. Very few people vote on WMATA as an issue, and the politicians know that. In fact, the ones that would vote on WMATA as an issue are likely the members of the local ATU, who push WMATA backwards.
5 replies · active 663 weeks ago
I agree to a point, but Metro is also a vital piece of infrastructure to everyone but the 1%.
I wish we had the opportunity to vote on WMATA as an issue.
I think WMATA should be re-structured, with the Board all elected positions.
So they can become as useful as lets say Congress?
It more useful to able to vote them out than to not be able to vote them out.
Davin Peterson's avatar

Davin Peterson · 663 weeks ago

If Metro had put speed restrictions, they may have prevented the derailment in the first place. Why isn't Metro implementing safety measures?

CSX, who owns the rails that Amtrak, Commuter Rail MARC & VRE trains operate on always implements heat restrictions of 40 MPH when the temperature gets to 90. This way if the engineer (driver) sees a track problem ahead, they can stop in time to prevent an accident. Back in 1992, an Amtrak train derailed because of a heat kink.
Enoch Emery's avatar

Enoch Emery · 663 weeks ago

According to the Washington DC Blue Ribbon Task Force on Pepco Service Reliability, It costs anywhere from $3M (for rural areas) to $11M (for congested urban areas) per mile to replace overhead infrastructure with underground wiring. On the other hand, it costs around $150,000 per mile to install an overhead line. A joint study with the DC Public Service Commion shows it would cost each customer nearly $100-$125 per month on their bills to put the wires underground.

Pepco’s rough estimate is that it would cost almost $4 billion to put all the lines in DC underground. Over 30 years, it would cost every DC customer an additional $50-$100 per month every month.
But wouldn't it significantly reduce the cost if they could piggyback on other projects that already need to dig up and then repave the road?
underground lines are not necessarily better. they are more susceptible to water damage and corrosion and are more costly to repair and maintain.
Pepco could bury more feeder lines which would cut down on the number of neighborhood wide outages. They don't need to do each house though.
it also costs each customer $300 of food spoilage when the electricity goes out...EACH TIME.
Enoch Emery's avatar

Enoch Emery · 663 weeks ago

You have $300 worth of perishable goods in your refrigerator? Um.... ok. First, according to the FDA, your food is good for 48 hours. After that, use a cooler and pack it with bags of ice that you can get for free at cooling stations. It's not rocket science.

But hey, if you'd rather pay an extra $50 per month (conservative estimate) every month for 30 years... go for it. I doubt many people who have the facts will be with you on that.
Red Line Rider's avatar

Red Line Rider · 663 weeks ago

I apologize if this is well-traveled territory, but has anyone tried submitting a FOIA request for documents pertaining to WMATA's operations? I'm not too well read on the ins and outs of FOIA law and how it might apply to Metro (especially when WMATA was created by Congress and has input from local jurisdictions; not sure what level of government the agency falls under), but anyone can file a FOIA request, not just media outlets.

I'd be curious to see what sort of information, if any, could be uncovered. But then again, perhaps WMATA would just ignore the request and pretend like it never happened. WMATA hasn't pulled shenanigans like that before, right?
5 replies · active 663 weeks ago
apparently they only process FOIA requests from media outlets. GreaterGreaterWashington tried to and was told they wont receive the info because "they are a blog"

And GGW is an outlet that generally goes rather easy on metro...
I have submitted numerous requests for information from Metro. In Metro-ese it's called PARP, not FOIA.) Here's the problem.

It takes them months and months to respond, and if the response is complete and makes sense (rare), the news peg has long passed for whatever it was you asked about in the first place.

I know my frustrations about this are shared by the Examiner and Times. I have no idea what the Post's experience has been, but based on their Metro "coverage," it has been a while since they PARPed anything.
If you believe in freedom of information, you must believe in slavery! Wait, what?
Its time to really start getting on Dr. Gridlock's case. He's having a chat today. Bombard it with questions and criticisms of his "journalism"
http://live.washingtonpost.com/gridlock-0723.html

Also, we should all contact the Ombudsman of the Washington Post and let the criticism of Dr. Gridlock and the Transportation team be heard. The coverage is unacceptable.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/patrick-b-pexton/20...
5 replies · active 663 weeks ago
The Ombud had a nice write-up taking the Post to task for their storm coverage. I posted there that the same complaints that he had about the storm coverage could easily be applied to their WMATA coverage as well.
Well, I tried to bring up this issue of the green line derailing and was completely ignored. Did anyone else bring this up?

Please contact the ombudsman. Get the ball rolling. We need better coverage from the Post.
The Anti-TB Guy's avatar

The Anti-TB Guy · 663 weeks ago

From today's Live Chat, here's what Dr. Gridlock thinks about Metro riders:

"If there's something about Metro riders that bothers me, it's that many who complain seem unwilling to act on their complaints. If riding Metro is intolerable, they should either become politically active in fixing the problems or find alternative forms of transportation that leave them feeling less abused. That might involve driving, but it might also involve biking or walking."

Ref: http://live.washingtonpost.com/gridlock-0709.html...
Oh, that's rich. Here's a theoretical reply to him:

"Dear Idiot Boy,

You say people seem unwilling to act on their complaints. It may surprise you to learn that *GOING TO THE PRESS* has been a valid way of acting on one's dissatisfaction with government or private companies for centuries. You. Are. The. Press. Act like it. Stop insulting us.

Secondly, although you pose biking and walking as viable alternative forms of transportation, your suggestion is utterly laughable. Yes, many people bike to and from work, and more power to them. However, it is both unreasonable and unconscionable to expect anyone who is even a little unhappy with the staggering lack of safety concerns at Metro to be able to do either of these things, for two glaringly obvious reasons: 1) Many people by necessity commute long distances into DC and can't walk/bike that far every day, five days a week, and 2) with the temperature - even without the heat index - routinely over 90 degrees every day, walking or biking can, for many, be a very dangerous choice. You should be embarrassed to be suggesting either as a viable alternative to paid-for public transportation."
woodstock's avatar

woodstock · 663 weeks ago

OL Rider got it right: Metro's and the effects of their incompetence have a smaller reach than Pepco's. Plus, they've s*cked a lot longer and on a much more regular basis than Pepco so when Metro works right is when it's remarkable.
my nightmare is a derailment on the red line elevated section over the brentwood yards...or rhode island ave. -shudder-

re: John's post above: very good idea; did anyone else see his response to the "rider revolt" in sunday's paper? (--which, of course, i can't find on the website.) basically soft pedaled the dozens of emails/tweets/posts etc which asserted it wasn't a "revolt" at all. frankly i'm surprised he printed it....
5 replies · active 663 weeks ago
Or on the elevated track that crosses 355/495 on the other side of the RL...
Frequent red liner 's avatar

Frequent red liner · 663 weeks ago

Yes! I travel there between medical center and grovesnor twice a day and this thought often crosses my mind. If something were to ever happen through that stretch...well, let's just hope nothing ever happens.
Made all the more likely by what appears to be a faulty installation of a section of new track *just* as the track begins the incline. Pay attention the next time you pass through this section headed north/towards Glenmont. There's a severe jerk when you round the corner, and that was not there before they "rehabilitated" that section of track. It's so severe that it almost knocked me off my feet the first few times, and I'm one of those people who can generally stand without holding on, face buried in phone. Mr. Unsuck, is there any way you could ask your insiders if they know anything about this? It's quite worrisome to me.
yes! that's exactly the spot i'm thinking of!
The Yellow line over the Potomac
Metro is not a transit agency, its a jobs program. Once you come to that realization, all of their actions make perfect sense. The goal is not to provide the best transit service that they can, but to make sure that everyone employed there gets to their next paycheck with the least amount of resistance.

I will say that during this past 'heat wave' I was expecting to see a whole lot of 'AC broken' on Metro cars. What happend there? I though that the AC only worked on Metro during Fall, Winter, and Spring.
2 replies · active 663 weeks ago
perhaps it is the "new normal" and ppl don't bother reporting it anymore...
perhaps the hot cars were just a 'phenomenon.'
Metro and Pepco are like the Reese's peanut butter cup of fail.
Running at full speed in near 100 degree weather is as reckless as trying to fly planes with de-icing in freezing rain.

Also amazing is this from the NTSB " The National Transportation Safety Board often conducts its own investigations after a derailment, but NTSB spokesman Keith Holloway said that because there were no fatalities and there is a relatively clear idea of what happened, “it doesn’t really merit an NTSB investigation at this point.”

Translated - we will wait until some dies to care
2 replies · active 663 weeks ago
When I read that NTSB quote, I figured that their staff is probably sick of investigating Metro and dealing with its staff, so that only the most serious incident (i.e., one with fatalities) could force them to go back to metro.
There's a petition online to get them to investigate platform overcrowding, but no one's really signed it. Sure, it wouldn't really amount to anything more than a symbolic gesture, but..
Translated - we will wait until some dies in order to justify the expenses an investigation would incur.

Fixed that for ya......
I wonder how a heat kink high speed derailment on the yellow line bridge over the river would have played out? I'd like to think it would be contained to the bridge, it but would certainly complicate things at best.
heat kinks are generally restricted to wooden cross ties. the overhead sections everyone mentioned are concrete secured plates. also there are restriction rails in place everywhere that the trains cross over roadways, bridges and overpasses. if you look in the roadbed at an elevated station you will see,a 34 inch steel bar running parallel to the track on the inner side. this is to prevent the train from "riding " all the way across the middle of the tracks.it will keep the train within several inches of the running rail
3 replies · active 663 weeks ago
Thanks for your knowledge on this! I couldn't really expect an official WMATA safety response
hmm, now that i look at it more closely, the warping in the photo at top *does* start where the ties are, just beyond the concrete slab. -whew-
I always wondered if that is what those were for. I've seen them on regular railroad bridges, but haven't had an opportunity to look at the track bed of WMATA's bridges.

So I guess it is less likely that the train will end up in the Potomac or on the beltway. However, it would certainly not help the evacuation and response.
Stan Dessel's avatar

Stan Dessel · 663 weeks ago

The phenomenom of the red line derailment was used to test our emergency response. The 'luck' as you call it of no one getting seriously hurt was brought to you by WMATA. You're welcome!

P.S. Please recommend us to all your sucker DC tourist friends visiting this summer! And thanks for your compliance to our lattest fare hike, aka robbing our full fare paying riders. (and we will catch all of you tailgaters!)
I ride the Metro at least twice a day, from home in downtown Silver Spring to work on 15th st nw. I used to be fine about things and rarely thought about accidents and other problems. Now, I am genuinely worried every time I board a train because I don't know whether my train will derail, crash into the back of another, or get stuck between stations. I'm seriously considering either moving closer to work and paying higher rent or just buying a cheap car.
Thank you for writing this piece. I have long wondered why politicians and the media hammer Pepco for acts of god, while Metro's man made mess appears to be invisible to local officials.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter