Friday, May 20, 2011

MetroLowersTargets


Metro is lowering its performance targets in several key areas, including on-time rates for trains and buses as well as availability for escalators.

In a presentation scheduled to be given to the Board next week (pp. 16-18), Metro says it's lowering its on-time target for rail from greater than 95 percent to greater than 90 percent. The reasons (their words):
  • 5% reduction due to manual train operations
  • Operators need additional time to manually stop at the stations and open/close the doors and there is greater variability between train operators
  • Trend data and prior experience validates new target
Bus on-time targets are being lowered from greater than 80 percent to greater than 78 percent. The reasons:
  • Metrobuses get caught in traffic on area roadways where congestion is bad and getting worse
  • Washington, DC is the most congested U.S. region according to the Texas Transportation Institute
  • Metrobus selected a stretch target of 78% even though historical trends indicate 75% as more attainable
For escalators, the goal is now greater than 89 percent availability as opposed to 93 percent, which they say is a stretch as "performance in 2011 is anticipated to decline." The reasons:
  • Needed capital overhauls will take almost twice as many units out of service
  • Improving to 60% preventive maintenance compliance will identify a backlog of repairs that must be addressed
Metro does say it expects to raise the bar for escalators in 2012.

Elsewhere in the presentation, Metro says they "will evaluate and revise escalator maintenance procedures with an emphasis on 'getting things right the first time.'”

Comments (15)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Sweet Bobby's avatar

Sweet Bobby · 722 weeks ago

Way to juke the stats, Metro.
Getting things right the first time hasn't been an emphasis before? Sweet.
I'm sure prices will continue to rise
ShartingExcellence's avatar

ShartingExcellence · 722 weeks ago

"This person consistently meets the low standards he sets for himself."
Even these new numbers are pie in the sky.
Edititout's avatar

Edititout · 722 weeks ago

So, tell us something we don't already know!
It must be so nice to be able to set your own standards. I wish I could do that at work or in university.

Their performance should be measured by an external auditor using top transit systems around the world as a benchmark.

Honestly though why can't these pricks just bring back automatic train control already? I'm tired of six-car trains leaving a fourth of the platform behind, I'm tired of jerky rides and I'm tired of... well... WMATA!
Let's recall that under this reporting criteria, Metro gets to count things "on time" if it's only delayed by 50% of the frequency. So if the 24 minutes between trains goes down as proposed, get ready to wait up to 36 minutes for your "on-time" train.

Also, 10% of the time, get ready to wait more than 36 minutes.
LoopyLou's avatar

LoopyLou · 722 weeks ago

So the roads are more crowded because we suck at giving people a viable alternative, so let's lower the standards so we'll fail worse at giving people a viable atlternative and the roads will be even more crowded...

ladies and gentlemen, i give you transit death spiral.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Don't know if it's quite that extreme, but it's certainly disheartening, can't have a great effect in the org, and at the very least, it's a TERRIBLE PR move.
sdafadfag's avatar

sdafadfag · 722 weeks ago

What the f*ck does greater variability among operators even mean? Other systems seems to take this into account.
How about hire managers who have the education and KSA'S to "raise the bar". I hear they are hiring employees who have no experience in Operations Central Control. Think about that!
elizabeth's avatar

elizabeth · 722 weeks ago

Ridiculous- the operators have no pride in their work because their company has no pride in their work (apologies to the operators who DO take pride in their commutes- I know you're there and have had you on occasion- wish everyone were LIKE you) MEET the standards, then try to surPASS them... never LOWER your standards!
We're aiming for mediocrest.
Granted I didn't visit every station in the system, but no way metro had 86.9% escalator availability in march 2011

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter