
Some takeaways from yesterday's Metro Board discussion on raising fares to close a $124 million budget gap:
"We are keeping the agency on a path of continued improvement." -- Carol D. Kissel, Assistant General Manager and Chief Financial Officer
It would seem riders and jurisdictions are being unfairly burdened with filling Metro's annual budget gaps. According to Metro, the pension plan for ATU 689 workers accounts for 65 percent of the base increase in Metro's costs. The average retiree's pension plan is worth $400,000, Metro said. There is NO employee contribution into that plan, Metro said. Who's gonna have the stones to get the union to face reality? ATU 689 likes to say "we make it work," but I think they mean "you."
Metro is planning for no wage increase in 2013, but they just shelled out a nine percent increase this year after a costly legal battle. I'm not sure how they plan to avoid a wage increase this time around given their track record. Maybe there was an agreement.
Despite stagnant-to-lower ridership, Metro had a revenue INCREASE between 2010 and 2011 of $54 million dollars, largely on your backs after taking you for $109 million more in 2011. That was offset by declining revenues in other areas, namely advertising. Who'd want to advertise on Metro, right? Oh wait, there's this outfit called Metroforward, and they're advertising EVERYWHERE.
Metro has 250 people involved in manual time keeping. Um, computers.
"This would mark the fourth year of stagnant or declining rail ridership. There is no good story yet about what's happening about the lingering aspects of the accident, [fare] elasticity and perceived unpredictability of the rail system during reconstruction. It doesn't bode well for us, and I would encourage staff to develop better data about what is happening with ridership." -- Board vice chair Tom Downs
Despite a relatively robust economy here in the DC area, Metro staff continues to blame its declining-to-stagnant ridership woes on the nationwide economic malaise. I guess they think stuff like this doesn't peel riders away.
Fare "changes and adjustments" means fare and parking increases. See the details of proposals here (starting on page 24). It was obvious from the discussion that the proposed fare hikes are going to meet with a lot of resistance from the Board's diverging interests. It will be interesting to see how it all shakes out. Dig deeper.
Some Board members don't understand the current fare structure. I'm not sure (insert genius) would either.
"Our timing and distance [fare] system is actually a very good system." -- Kissel
Anyone (tourists) still using paper fare cards, could be be completely effed based on a rather arbitrary ring called a "visitor zone" idea. Paper fares (non SmarTrip) within it would be $3, while fares outside would be $6. Rosslyn to DC-$3; Clarendon to DC-$6. Just cough up the five bucks for the SmarTrip already.
250,000 riders are "price insensitive," Metro said. It was unclear just exactly who those riders are. Peak of the peak was meant to serve two purposes: raise revenue and reduce rush hour crowding. It worked bigtime to raise revenue, but did little to shift riders' habits, perhaps because a good chunk of riders--the conventional wisdom is 40 percent of Metro riders are Feds--have their rides heavily to completely subsidized and don't care about peak of the peak fares. Starting Jan. 1, if the transit benefit is not extended, this cohort will become way more concerned with price. Did Metro not know there was this group before instituting the insulting peak of the peak fares?
Things like paying for overtime (fatigue management), adding police on buses, preventative maintenance on the escalators and improving the radio system would be, in essence, up to the individual jurisdictions as to whether they want to fund them. This could end up with some wacky negotiations.
Sarles admitted that previous years' budget gap discussions of service cuts were red herrings. Thanks, man.
Metro blew a lot of money getting "transit strength" snow removal equipment--amount unknown. It seems snowmageddon triggered it. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst of the worst?
After listening to Kubicek's inartful tap dancing about Dupont closures, I need a drink. He really says "thaddaways" --all the time! The right hand man.
Other items:
Kara · 694 weeks ago
RGG · 694 weeks ago
Metro's "multiplier" for their 689 employees isn't actually all that great (something like 40-43% of highest average 3 year salary after 27 years service) but they can include overtime, which is why you often read about so many making over $100K per year. Many get all the hours they can when they're younger to boost the average per-year pay towards their pension, plus a few extra years on the job will boost the retirement amount due to years of service combined with the "multiplier."
Maybe Metro could offer to boost the "multiplier" a bit and disallow the inclusion of overtime in a future contract. Not all Metro employees get to include overtime--this seems to be a 689 thing-- but the other employees have higher "multipliers" on their base pay.
Anonbu · 694 weeks ago
Did you know also that some Union Officials were taking out some of their monies and investing the money then returning the money?
Sizzle · 694 weeks ago
I work for an international corporation. My yearly raise is not guaranteed. It is based on my PERFORMANCE. We have a pension and we have 401K options. You know who funds them? I DO! Sure, the company puts money in too, but MY pay funds MY retirement savings.
I truly don't understand why union workers are exempt from this. From my experience, workers who aren't held accountable for their performance don't give a shit. It seems like most Metro employees are almost legally barred from being fired for poor performance. How is this fair? I'm not trying to generalize, I know that there are plenty of hard-working Metro employees who go out and do a damn good job every day, but I've met quite a few who - for lack of a better term - suck.
Does anyone else think that a complete overhaul of the union would significantly improve Metro's employee performance, and in turn improving Metro's performance?
Naz · 694 weeks ago
UNBELIEVABLE!
Kara · 694 weeks ago
I REALLY hope congress lets the transit benefit go back to $125. When people are leaving metro in droves because it is no longer cheap to use it maybe metro will face reality over their fares.
@chrispulaski · 694 weeks ago
http://www.thompson.com/public/newsbrief.jsp?cat=...
Ever and Anon · 694 weeks ago
Kara · 694 weeks ago
DC Denizen · 694 weeks ago
DMCinDC · 694 weeks ago
I am at a tipping point as well. I have considered the benefits to driving over metro, have looked into parking garages and I'd save at least 30-60 minutes more of my time each day, but I also considered the nagatives, and they are pretty much even at this point. But if I have to pay more for metros crap sevrice, that tips the scales for me... and I am not going to pay anymore than I already do to ride metro in it's current horrid state. I am just not.
I already see that the escalator at Dupont South may be down for a year, and I suppose everyone will just have to clog up the North exit/entrance every day and it will delay me 10-15 minutes more now just to get to work.
I also have never been illegally (random searches with no probably cause) "bag searched" yet on metro, but if that ever comes to light, I will NEVER ride metro again. EVER, and would file a suit against them. I certainly hope anyone who was illegally searched did the same.
John · 694 weeks ago
I actually wish metro would just put ads anywhere they can put them. I dont care how tacky it looks, just do it. Anything to gather revenue.
And everyone else has had to lay off people in the recession. I know a TON of people at metro who not only should be laid off, but outright FIRED.
This union goes way too far, a union should be in place to fight for workers rights and fight to make sure they are paid a FAIR wage. This union makes it impossible for incompetent workers to be fired and fights to make sure that its workers rob metro blind. They achieve this with a race-baiting union leader in Jackie Jeter and by paying off arbitrators to rule in their favor on just about anything.
Disgusting.
RGG · 694 weeks ago
Your source, please?
John · 694 weeks ago
You have a source they aren't being paid off?
hrh king friday 13 · 694 weeks ago
Ever and Anon · 694 weeks ago
hrh king friday 13 · 694 weeks ago
Besides, I'm not saying get rid of Metro rail in the sense of plugging up the tunnels and calling it a day. I'm saying the system's workfoce and management shoud be forced into its inevitiable collapse sooner than later so it can be rebuilt. And I'm serious when I say we should transfer ownership to a private or foriegn company. Imagine a metro system operated by Japanese ROBOTS. Have you seen what those things can do? :)
RGG · 694 weeks ago
I think this is simply because the Local 689 contract will expire (I think at the end of this year). The three, 3% raises covered each year of the last 3 year contract, so it'll have to be re-negotiated --again. Crazy how this stuff drags on for so long that it's time to start all over again once it's settled.
Tdun4 · 694 weeks ago
I can now drive to work cheaper than take the train.
I believe Metro employees did NOT deserve another raise!
And where is the diversity in employee hiring?
Calabria · 694 weeks ago
Early 2012 can't come soon enough.
Soylent Green Line · 694 weeks ago
Besides their bullshit PR-stunt about replacing (gasp) a few lousy escalators, there has been no "continued improvement." This is the kind of bold faced lie that makes my blood absolutely boil.
Any regular rider with half a brain knows that the service isn't improving, and that it hasn't improved since the last round of fare increases. Why should we believe that another round of fare increases is going to fix anything?
I for one already have my savings account started. As soon as I get my new pad, I'm going to buy a car and use that or start biking to work.
Metro, why do you make things so hard? Why can't you be a reliable and efficient transit system? The sad thing is that I've done the math, and driving is actually going to be cheaper than riding metro. That's how screwed up things really are. The whole system should be privatized if it hopes to have any kind of future.
guest · 694 weeks ago
Mat · 694 weeks ago
Anon · 694 weeks ago
Also Jackie and Roland Jeter Pres and V Pres get to average their retirement with UNION PAY as they earn each over $100,000.00 a year!
beema · 694 weeks ago
Mike · 694 weeks ago
Fed up · 689 weeks ago
RGG · 694 weeks ago
Concepts for fare change proposal:
• Eliminate peak-of-the-peak surcharge
My guess? This will just become everyone's NORMAL rush-hour fare, now.
• Adjust off-peak fares to simplify pricing
Round them.....UP??!!
Parking Fee Changes:
• Increase enforcement at kiss-and-ride Meters
STOP allowing cars with handicap placards to park at the meters for free!! Every jurisdiction is getting away from this concept, it's time for Metro to do the same. Reserved spots are fine, but they pay like the rest of us! Hell, if you';re able-bodied enough to go to work, aren't you able-bodied enough to feed a meter? Some of the lower Green Line stations Kiss and Rides are filled with nothing but handicap placard bearing cars. No wonder Metro doesn't have any money!
Change paper farecard pricing from
distance-based to two-zone system
– $3 for all trips within “visitor zone”
– $6 for all other trips
– Eliminate 1-day pass & cash surcharge
I'm unclear if this is for "rush-hour" fares or "non-rush" or both?
John · 694 weeks ago
They completely forget that most complaints filed aren't even recorded, they simply just go in the trash. Despicable "reporting"
art vandalay · 694 weeks ago
Ridiculous. Will seriously look into biking in next year.
art vandalay · 694 weeks ago
John · 694 weeks ago
Matt G · 694 weeks ago
Guest · 694 weeks ago
· 694 weeks ago
any justification to spend spend spend and spend.
Kipp · 694 weeks ago
No one · 694 weeks ago
They went thaddaways.
Paying Customer · 694 weeks ago
Get rid of free ridership and watch the uproar from those who to this point only bitched about free crappy service. Metro is shielded from this, unfortunately.
anon · 694 weeks ago
Doug · 689 weeks ago
I understand fare hikes are inevitable, but before fare hikes there should be cost cutting taking place. Has anyone ever heard any talk of cutting costs at all from any metro people? I've lived here ten years and I've heard nothing about cutting waste or employees having to compromise some like the rest of the world has had to.
perkinsms 75p · 694 weeks ago
composite distance, which is the average of the straight-line distance
and the track distance using the shortest path. Then based on that
distance, there are two distance based formulas. The peak rail formula
has a base fare, two piecewise linear functions for additional
distance, and a maximum. The peak of peak fare is 20 cents higher than
the peak fare. The offpeak fare has three fixed prices depending on if
the trip is short, medium or long. Trips taken using a paper farecard
are more expensive by 25 cents. The fares can be approximated by using Legendre polynomial expansion of a Taylor series approximation of a Bessel function of the first kind over a finite, concave Hilbert space. The supercomputer they use to calculate the fare tables is from the 1970s and can process over THOUSANDS of operations per day.
IT'S SIMPLE DAMMIT.
DC Denizen · 694 weeks ago
@savemetro · 694 weeks ago
@savemetro · 694 weeks ago
John · 694 weeks ago
I'm all for gettin rid of that corrupt union though.
And putting Jackie Jeter in jail....
RGG · 694 weeks ago
For what?
Anon4life · 694 weeks ago
Guest · 694 weeks ago
Nick · 694 weeks ago
I use metro daily from WFC-downtown for my commute, but my wife and I never, ever, use it on weekends (or weeknight trips). Even if we are going to see friends in Clarendon or something - driving > metro all the time. And I hate that - I don't like burning gas and clogging up the highways, but the choice is too easy. 40 minutes of waiting for trains when all is said and done (plus paying for fares), versus no waiting to drive the car? I'd consider running the numbers on car/parking commute, but 66HOV restrictions and the limited time frame I'm going to live in Virginia make investing in a car a pretty complicated decision.
I'll all for public transit, but metro needs to unsuck itself. Thank god I'm at WFC now - just this morning there was "unscheduled track maintenance" at Dunn Loring, so there was single tracking between WFC and Vienna. People @ Vienna got screwed, but they pulled trains out of the WFC railyard to head inbound so I didn't have to wait.
Soylent Green Line · 694 weeks ago
It's kind of a shame that public transit has taken such a bad rap in recent times. When you're living in a densely-populated area like DC, there should be other viable options besides every individual driving in separate cars.
Of course, public transit equals socialism in the minds of some, but that's the frame of mind that needs to be challenged.
Oh wait... I hear something... it's reality calling! Here we are discussing ways that WMATA could improve, when the truth is it won't and we'll still pay more for it .
I'm reminded of Princess Leia's quote to Darth Vader: "The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."
Seems appropriate.
DMCinDC · 694 weeks ago
Guest · 694 weeks ago
Anon · 694 weeks ago
DC Denizen · 694 weeks ago
http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/news/PressReleas...
How is spending money on this (purchasing, maintaining, insuring, etc.) more important than, say, replacing dangerous footing on the platform at Braddock? Fixing elevators/escalators? Hiring additional Transit police? Sheesh. Bend over, indeed.
Matt G · 694 weeks ago
RGG · 694 weeks ago
Guest · 694 weeks ago
RGG · 694 weeks ago
BlackRose · 694 weeks ago
EffMetro · 694 weeks ago
Every morning, I dread having to embark on the dirty, crowded journey to work. On a good day, I will leave the metro just feeling a little gross. On a bad day, I will be 1-2 hours late for work and leave the metro hoping that someone will burn it down.
Among the seemingly never ending list of common problems and annoyances that plague my relationship with metro are:
1) When there is track maintenance, all hell breaks loose
2) Trains oftentimes have this ridiculous way of stopping and then creeping forward just an inch or so, stopping, creeping forward another inch or so, and then finally coming to a complete stop only two inches ahead of where it first stopped. If train operators think this is a funny joke, let me tell you - it absolutely is not.
3) The escalators at stations that I frequently visit have been "in repair" for 6+ months. I don't know what kind of magical elevators metro uses, but I have never been in any place where escalators take that long to repair. The best is when the really tall escalators at Bethesda or Rosslyn break - that way I can essentially walk up hundreds of steps to get to ground level.
4) It's clear that trains and stations are rarely, if ever, properly cleaned.
5) On weekends, I can expect my miserable travel time on the metro to double, triple, or quadruple due to maintenance
6) In the summer, the A/C breaks – a lot
7) Trains are way too frequently offloaded due to mechanical failures.
8) Many of the train operators mumble. I often can’t hear what station is coming up next or what issues we might be experiencing . When I’m fortunate enough to actually understand what’s being said, I sometimes hear the wrong station being announced.
9) The station managers and other staff are horribly mean. When I go up to them to ask a question, they get pissed off because they actually have to work for their money. They treat me like garbage.
10) I’ve made formal complaints, but no one working in the metro system seems to give a damn. Surprise surprise.
And the list goes on and on……
For a system that's only been around for a few decades, its horribly poor performance is uncanny. I pay an inordinate amount of money for terrible service, but unfortunately, metro’s got a nice monopoly going on so I’m completely dependent on it to get to my job in downtown DC. Now that I know so much of my money is going towards pension plans for rude and lazy employees, I can feel my blood boil.
Dear Ms. Carol D. Kissel, Assistant General Manager and Chief Financial Officer for metro, YOU CAN GO KISSEL MY A$$.
Guest · 694 weeks ago
aergweherwg · 694 weeks ago
Anon · 694 weeks ago