Friday, December 2, 2011

Bend Over



Some takeaways from yesterday's Metro Board discussion on raising fares to close a $124 million budget gap:

"We are keeping the agency on a path of continued improvement." -- Carol D. Kissel, Assistant General Manager and Chief Financial Officer

It would seem riders and jurisdictions are being unfairly burdened with filling Metro's annual budget gaps. According to Metro, the pension plan for ATU 689 workers accounts for 65 percent of the base increase in Metro's costs. The average retiree's pension plan is worth $400,000, Metro said. There is NO employee contribution into that plan, Metro said. Who's gonna have the stones to get the union to face reality? ATU 689 likes to say "we make it work," but I think they mean "you."

Metro is planning for no wage increase in 2013, but they just shelled out a nine percent increase this year after a costly legal battle. I'm not sure how they plan to avoid a wage increase this time around given their track record. Maybe there was an agreement.

Despite stagnant-to-lower ridership, Metro had a revenue INCREASE between 2010 and 2011 of $54 million dollars, largely on your backs after taking you for $109 million more in 2011. That was offset by declining revenues in other areas, namely advertising. Who'd want to advertise on Metro, right? Oh wait, there's this outfit called Metroforward, and they're advertising EVERYWHERE.

Metro has 250 people involved in manual time keeping. Um, computers.

"This would mark the fourth year of stagnant or declining rail ridership. There is no good story yet about what's happening about the lingering aspects of the accident, [fare] elasticity and perceived unpredictability of the rail system during reconstruction. It doesn't bode well for us, and I would encourage staff to develop better data about what is happening with ridership." -- Board vice chair Tom Downs

Despite a relatively robust economy here in the DC area, Metro staff continues to blame its declining-to-stagnant ridership woes on the nationwide economic malaise. I guess they think stuff like this doesn't peel riders away.

Fare "changes and adjustments" means fare and parking increases. See the details of proposals here (starting on page 24). It was obvious from the discussion that the proposed fare hikes are going to meet with a lot of resistance from the Board's diverging interests. It will be interesting to see how it all shakes out. Dig deeper.

Some Board members don't understand the current fare structure. I'm not sure (insert genius) would either.

"Our timing and distance [fare] system is actually a very good system." -- Kissel

Anyone (tourists) still using paper fare cards, could be be completely effed based on a rather arbitrary ring called a "visitor zone" idea. Paper fares (non SmarTrip) within it would be $3, while fares outside would be $6. Rosslyn to DC-$3; Clarendon to DC-$6. Just cough up the five bucks for the SmarTrip already.

250,000 riders are "price insensitive," Metro said. It was unclear just exactly who those riders are. Peak of the peak was meant to serve two purposes: raise revenue and reduce rush hour crowding. It worked bigtime to raise revenue, but did little to shift riders' habits, perhaps because a good chunk of riders--the conventional wisdom is 40 percent of Metro riders are Feds--have their rides heavily to completely subsidized and don't care about peak of the peak fares. Starting Jan. 1, if the transit benefit is not extended, this cohort will become way more concerned with price. Did Metro not know there was this group before instituting the insulting peak of the peak fares?

Things like paying for overtime (fatigue management), adding police on buses, preventative maintenance on the escalators and improving the radio system would be, in essence, up to the individual jurisdictions as to whether they want to fund them. This could end up with some wacky negotiations.

Sarles admitted that previous years' budget gap discussions of service cuts were red herrings. Thanks, man.

Metro blew a lot of money getting "transit strength" snow removal equipment--amount unknown. It seems snowmageddon triggered it. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst of the worst?

After listening to Kubicek's inartful tap dancing about Dupont closures, I need a drink. He really says "thaddaways" --all the time! The right hand man.

Other items:

Comments (63)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Wait. They get pensions? On top of that, they do not even need to pay one dime for it? What the ****? Absolutely none of the jobs I have ever worked at have even mentioned the word 'pension', I thought they mostly dissapeared by the 70s.
2 replies · active 694 weeks ago
My understanding of Metro's pension is Local 689 employees used to pay into it, but as Metro's employee numbers grew over the years, no more contributions were needed due to the sheer amount of money in the plan. I don't know if that's 100% accurate, but I believe that's what I was told by an old retiree. Actually, I didn't even know that Metro still paid into it either. If they do, and it's becoming a funding problem, then in all fairness the 689 folks should be willing to contribute to it once again. But, that's a negotiating issue for the next contract...... Not too many employers utilize "defined benefit" plans anymore, opting for the 401(k) route, instead, but many "public" style agencies still have them.

Metro's "multiplier" for their 689 employees isn't actually all that great (something like 40-43% of highest average 3 year salary after 27 years service) but they can include overtime, which is why you often read about so many making over $100K per year. Many get all the hours they can when they're younger to boost the average per-year pay towards their pension, plus a few extra years on the job will boost the retirement amount due to years of service combined with the "multiplier."

Maybe Metro could offer to boost the "multiplier" a bit and disallow the inclusion of overtime in a future contract. Not all Metro employees get to include overtime--this seems to be a 689 thing-- but the other employees have higher "multipliers" on their base pay.
RGG-
Did you know also that some Union Officials were taking out some of their monies and investing the money then returning the money?
I'm sorry. I know there's a lot of controversy over workers' rights and union labor, but I find this sort of thing ridiculous.

I work for an international corporation. My yearly raise is not guaranteed. It is based on my PERFORMANCE. We have a pension and we have 401K options. You know who funds them? I DO! Sure, the company puts money in too, but MY pay funds MY retirement savings.

I truly don't understand why union workers are exempt from this. From my experience, workers who aren't held accountable for their performance don't give a shit. It seems like most Metro employees are almost legally barred from being fired for poor performance. How is this fair? I'm not trying to generalize, I know that there are plenty of hard-working Metro employees who go out and do a damn good job every day, but I've met quite a few who - for lack of a better term - suck.

Does anyone else think that a complete overhaul of the union would significantly improve Metro's employee performance, and in turn improving Metro's performance?
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
If I behaved in the same manner as most metro employees at my job, I'd be fired INSTANTLY.

UNBELIEVABLE!
They want off-peak to go up to be 90% of peak too? SInce the trains are half as frequent would not a fair price be 50% of peak?

I REALLY hope congress lets the transit benefit go back to $125. When people are leaving metro in droves because it is no longer cheap to use it maybe metro will face reality over their fares.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 694 weeks ago

The "price insensitive" riders are Metro employees who do not pay to ride.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
From the context it sounded like people who would pay any amount demanded, not people who would ride for free. The post article coupled that phrase with talking about federal employees that get a full transit subsidy.
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 694 weeks ago

I was having the drive/Metro discussion with a colleague this morning, and we both agreed that we're at the tipping point. If they raise fares, it might cost a little more to drive, but it would save me about an hour and ten minutes every day. My time is worth something, too. Tough call. It might come down to the weather, since if it's nice, I can bike to the Metro and save myself the parking fee.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
"I was having the drive/Metro discussion with a colleague this morning, and we both agreed that we're at the tipping point."

I am at a tipping point as well. I have considered the benefits to driving over metro, have looked into parking garages and I'd save at least 30-60 minutes more of my time each day, but I also considered the nagatives, and they are pretty much even at this point. But if I have to pay more for metros crap sevrice, that tips the scales for me... and I am not going to pay anymore than I already do to ride metro in it's current horrid state. I am just not.

I already see that the escalator at Dupont South may be down for a year, and I suppose everyone will just have to clog up the North exit/entrance every day and it will delay me 10-15 minutes more now just to get to work.

I also have never been illegally (random searches with no probably cause) "bag searched" yet on metro, but if that ever comes to light, I will NEVER ride metro again. EVER, and would file a suit against them. I certainly hope anyone who was illegally searched did the same.
If you think that metro employees should contribute to their pension plans, then obviously you believe in slavery.

I actually wish metro would just put ads anywhere they can put them. I dont care how tacky it looks, just do it. Anything to gather revenue.

And everyone else has had to lay off people in the recession. I know a TON of people at metro who not only should be laid off, but outright FIRED.

This union goes way too far, a union should be in place to fight for workers rights and fight to make sure they are paid a FAIR wage. This union makes it impossible for incompetent workers to be fired and fights to make sure that its workers rob metro blind. They achieve this with a race-baiting union leader in Jackie Jeter and by paying off arbitrators to rule in their favor on just about anything.

Disgusting.
2 replies · active 694 weeks ago
"....and by paying off arbitrators to rule in their favor on just about anything. "

Your source, please?
These people AREN'T on the take? They give someone their job back after they punched an off duty police officer while they were driving a bus route? They allow someone who ran a prostitution ring out of metro to return to work.

You have a source they aren't being paid off?
hrh king friday 13's avatar

hrh king friday 13 · 694 weeks ago

I would love to see WMATA try to reign in the ATU 689 and then for the Jeterites to threaten a strike. I think the Metro system is more financially feeble then management is letting on, and a disruption of such magnitute by the union would spell the end for both WMATA and that lazy ass union. After all the fare increases, lousy customer service, and killing people, it would be the tipping point for Metro riders. When the dust settles we do the obvious: complete restructuring and/or sell the damn thing to the Japanese.
2 replies · active 694 weeks ago
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 694 weeks ago

Nice idea hrh king but I have on other way to get to work. What happens to me? :)
hrh king friday 13's avatar

hrh king friday 13 · 694 weeks ago

That's the kind of thinking that Metro thrives on to continue to do what it does. Drive, carpool, bike, walk, bus... rollerblade.

Besides, I'm not saying get rid of Metro rail in the sense of plugging up the tunnels and calling it a day. I'm saying the system's workfoce and management shoud be forced into its inevitiable collapse sooner than later so it can be rebuilt. And I'm serious when I say we should transfer ownership to a private or foriegn company. Imagine a metro system operated by Japanese ROBOTS. Have you seen what those things can do? :)
"Metro is planning for no wage increase in 2013, but they just shelled out a nine percent increase this year after a costly legal battle. I'm not sure how they plan to avoid a wage increase this time around given their track record. Maybe there was an agreement."

I think this is simply because the Local 689 contract will expire (I think at the end of this year). The three, 3% raises covered each year of the last 3 year contract, so it'll have to be re-negotiated --again. Crazy how this stuff drags on for so long that it's time to start all over again once it's settled.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
Hey RGG Do you think it could have been appealed by the Metro Board and it was a 'back room deal' with Jackie Jeter and some board members?

I can now drive to work cheaper than take the train.
I believe Metro employees did NOT deserve another raise!
And where is the diversity in employee hiring?
I am counting down the days when I: 1. move a little further off of the orange line than I am now so that 2. I can buy a car to commute to work, only walking to Metro when I really, really need it.

Early 2012 can't come soon enough.
Soylent Green Line's avatar

Soylent Green Line · 694 weeks ago

""We are keeping the agency on a path of continued improvement." -- Carol D. Kissel, Assistant General Manager and Chief Financial Officer."

Besides their bullshit PR-stunt about replacing (gasp) a few lousy escalators, there has been no "continued improvement." This is the kind of bold faced lie that makes my blood absolutely boil.

Any regular rider with half a brain knows that the service isn't improving, and that it hasn't improved since the last round of fare increases. Why should we believe that another round of fare increases is going to fix anything?

I for one already have my savings account started. As soon as I get my new pad, I'm going to buy a car and use that or start biking to work.

Metro, why do you make things so hard? Why can't you be a reliable and efficient transit system? The sad thing is that I've done the math, and driving is actually going to be cheaper than riding metro. That's how screwed up things really are. The whole system should be privatized if it hopes to have any kind of future.
Is 400K for the pension a YEAR or over the lifetime? If it's the former, than there's a problem, if it's the latter, then that doesn't seem to bother me. Let's say you retire at 65. If you live the current US life expectency of 13 years to 78, that's 30.7K a year. I'm not really going to call that overly generous. You can argue over whether they should have pensions or make contributions or whatever, and don't tend to disagree, but that's really between the union and management and the deal they reach.
2 replies · active 694 weeks ago
"Guest", Common sense would dictate the a former bus driver in the metro system does not receive $400,000/year in retirement. If they did, we'd all quit our jobs and become bus drivers. I understand your logic that it is not overly generous, but please use a little common sense.
How about $2000.00 a month! The overtime thee drivers make is averaged into a High 4 years of yearly pay and that make for BIG BUCKS at retirement. No other Federal Employee gets this perk!

Also Jackie and Roland Jeter Pres and V Pres get to average their retirement with UNION PAY as they earn each over $100,000.00 a year!
Wait, ridership is declining? Then why the hell is my commute progressively more crowded every month?
2 replies · active 689 weeks ago
I don't know anyone who rides on the weekends anymore. I used to use the Metro on the weekends all the time, but I gave up due to having to wait so long for trains.
I was always riding metro with my kids to go downtown, at least once a weekend, no more. I haven't ridden metro on the weekend in over two years, not after the time my son had to use a bathroom and the station "manager" ignored us then yelled at us, an adult and a three-year-old. We wouldn't have had to use the restroom if it wasn't for the "27 minute" wait, which actually was 40+ minutes.
From the Preliminary Operating Budget:

Concepts for fare change proposal:
• Eliminate peak-of-the-peak surcharge

My guess? This will just become everyone's NORMAL rush-hour fare, now.

• Adjust off-peak fares to simplify pricing

Round them.....UP??!!

Parking Fee Changes:
• Increase enforcement at kiss-and-ride Meters
STOP allowing cars with handicap placards to park at the meters for free!! Every jurisdiction is getting away from this concept, it's time for Metro to do the same. Reserved spots are fine, but they pay like the rest of us! Hell, if you';re able-bodied enough to go to work, aren't you able-bodied enough to feed a meter? Some of the lower Green Line stations Kiss and Rides are filled with nothing but handicap placard bearing cars. No wonder Metro doesn't have any money!

Change paper farecard pricing from
distance-based to two-zone system
– $3 for all trips within “visitor zone”
– $6 for all other trips
– Eliminate 1-day pass & cash surcharge

I'm unclear if this is for "rush-hour" fares or "non-rush" or both?
Oh, How bout that fluff piece by Dr. Gridlock and his merry band of metro ass kissers over at the Post, saying that not many people file complaints to metro?

They completely forget that most complaints filed aren't even recorded, they simply just go in the trash. Despicable "reporting"
art vandalay's avatar

art vandalay · 694 weeks ago

To quote Kevin Bacon as Chip in 'Animal House', "Thank you sir, may I have another?".

Ridiculous. Will seriously look into biking in next year.
art vandalay's avatar

art vandalay · 694 weeks ago

To quote Kevin Bacon as Chip in 'Animal House', "Thank you sir, may I have another?".
3 replies · active 694 weeks ago
Art Vandalay? Of Art Vandalay industries?
Judge Arthur Vandalay
I could use a part-time job to pay for the upcoming fare increase. You hiring any latex salesmen?
With regard to the snow machinery. This is how it works. You point to a great disaster and say "look what happened we need this stuff so it never happens again" Thing is the thing that caused disaster, in this case snow never happens.

any justification to spend spend spend and spend.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
Hey, they're following after the master of this strategy, the amazing federal government. "Quick, spend all the money, actually, spend even more than all of it; we need to look like we need more funding next year. We wouldn't want them to cut our funding because we didn't spend it all, would we??"
Where'd the fare hikes go?
They went thaddaways.
Paying Customer's avatar

Paying Customer · 694 weeks ago

The "price insensitive" riders are those who receive their passes through work, mostly govt. workers, but also a large portion of private workers. Must be nice to not have to pay $2,500 a year just to ride a crappy train. If there were no free passes I can assure you metro's ills would be a MUCH bigger issue, imagine if everyone had to pay for such incompetence!

Get rid of free ridership and watch the uproar from those who to this point only bitched about free crappy service. Metro is shielded from this, unfortunately.
2 replies · active 689 weeks ago
Yes, that would be nice. Not all companies subsidize the same amount. Mine adds up to $840 per year.
I believe the fact that many riders are paying a portion or none of their fares is a huge issue. If everyone had to pay the full fare then I'm certain metro wouldn't get away with what they charge for such substandard service in return.

I understand fare hikes are inevitable, but before fare hikes there should be cost cutting taking place. Has anyone ever heard any talk of cutting costs at all from any metro people? I've lived here ten years and I've heard nothing about cutting waste or employees having to compromise some like the rest of the world has had to.
The metro fare system is easy. every origin-designation pair has a
composite distance, which is the average of the straight-line distance
and the track distance using the shortest path. Then based on that
distance, there are two distance based formulas. The peak rail formula
has a base fare, two piecewise linear functions for additional
distance, and a maximum. The peak of peak fare is 20 cents higher than
the peak fare. The offpeak fare has three fixed prices depending on if
the trip is short, medium or long. Trips taken using a paper farecard
are more expensive by 25 cents. The fares can be approximated by using Legendre polynomial expansion of a Taylor series approximation of a Bessel function of the first kind over a finite, concave Hilbert space. The supercomputer they use to calculate the fare tables is from the 1970s and can process over THOUSANDS of operations per day.

IT'S SIMPLE DAMMIT.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 694 weeks ago

Reminds me of the old "zone" system that the taxis were on...
By privatizing, they would lose funding from the district, maryland, and virginia. Metro would lose $300 Million a year by privatizing.

I'm all for gettin rid of that corrupt union though.

And putting Jackie Jeter in jail....
"And putting Jackie Jeter in jail...."

For what?
Anon4life's avatar

Anon4life · 694 weeks ago

Why doesn't Jackie Jeter be the first at reducing her salary with the Union and oh year her husband the Vice President! Isn't this illegal?
What ever happened to the idea to allow vendors in Metro stations to raise revenue? like the DVD vending machine kiosks? Are they still around?
I'm thoroughly looking forward to 2013, when I will probably be going to graduate school or have a new job somewhere else.

I use metro daily from WFC-downtown for my commute, but my wife and I never, ever, use it on weekends (or weeknight trips). Even if we are going to see friends in Clarendon or something - driving > metro all the time. And I hate that - I don't like burning gas and clogging up the highways, but the choice is too easy. 40 minutes of waiting for trains when all is said and done (plus paying for fares), versus no waiting to drive the car? I'd consider running the numbers on car/parking commute, but 66HOV restrictions and the limited time frame I'm going to live in Virginia make investing in a car a pretty complicated decision.

I'll all for public transit, but metro needs to unsuck itself. Thank god I'm at WFC now - just this morning there was "unscheduled track maintenance" at Dunn Loring, so there was single tracking between WFC and Vienna. People @ Vienna got screwed, but they pulled trains out of the WFC railyard to head inbound so I didn't have to wait.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
Soylent Green Line's avatar

Soylent Green Line · 694 weeks ago

I completely agree. There's no reason there should be a stigma attached to utilizing public transit. If it could be made to function effectively - and at this point it's clear the only way for that to happen is a fundamental organizational change or outright privatization - riding the Metro wouldn't have such negative connotations.

It's kind of a shame that public transit has taken such a bad rap in recent times. When you're living in a densely-populated area like DC, there should be other viable options besides every individual driving in separate cars.

Of course, public transit equals socialism in the minds of some, but that's the frame of mind that needs to be challenged.

Oh wait... I hear something... it's reality calling! Here we are discussing ways that WMATA could improve, when the truth is it won't and we'll still pay more for it .

I'm reminded of Princess Leia's quote to Darth Vader: "The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

Seems appropriate.
"metro needs to unsuck itself" ... So true.
Is Metro permitted to issue/sell bonds? If they already have, when do they mature? Are they credit-worthy enough to issue/sell more bonds to cover their "shortfalls"?
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
metro is not broke they just are corrupt!
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 694 weeks ago

AND here's where our money is going. Because people are too lazy to patrol parking areas on foot... They bought a fleet of glorified golf carts so they can ride around in style.
http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/news/PressReleas...

How is spending money on this (purchasing, maintaining, insuring, etc.) more important than, say, replacing dangerous footing on the platform at Braddock? Fixing elevators/escalators? Hiring additional Transit police? Sheesh. Bend over, indeed.
2 replies · active 694 weeks ago
Wow, this is a pretty stupid purchase.
Patrolling a station such as Franconia-Springfield, Vienna, or even Branch Avenue, on foot would take forever. I don't think these are such a bad idea.
Perhaps Metro could raise funds by collecting a portion of the revenue from all fencings of electronic devices stolen from riders.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
Can't. Metro will be accused of racism.
BlackRose's avatar

BlackRose · 694 weeks ago

I am so HAPPY that I have a car now!
Metro is truly the shame of the nation's capital and the bain of my existence.

Every morning, I dread having to embark on the dirty, crowded journey to work. On a good day, I will leave the metro just feeling a little gross. On a bad day, I will be 1-2 hours late for work and leave the metro hoping that someone will burn it down.

Among the seemingly never ending list of common problems and annoyances that plague my relationship with metro are:

1) When there is track maintenance, all hell breaks loose

2) Trains oftentimes have this ridiculous way of stopping and then creeping forward just an inch or so, stopping, creeping forward another inch or so, and then finally coming to a complete stop only two inches ahead of where it first stopped. If train operators think this is a funny joke, let me tell you - it absolutely is not.

3) The escalators at stations that I frequently visit have been "in repair" for 6+ months. I don't know what kind of magical elevators metro uses, but I have never been in any place where escalators take that long to repair. The best is when the really tall escalators at Bethesda or Rosslyn break - that way I can essentially walk up hundreds of steps to get to ground level.

4) It's clear that trains and stations are rarely, if ever, properly cleaned.

5) On weekends, I can expect my miserable travel time on the metro to double, triple, or quadruple due to maintenance

6) In the summer, the A/C breaks – a lot

7) Trains are way too frequently offloaded due to mechanical failures.

8) Many of the train operators mumble. I often can’t hear what station is coming up next or what issues we might be experiencing . When I’m fortunate enough to actually understand what’s being said, I sometimes hear the wrong station being announced.

9) The station managers and other staff are horribly mean. When I go up to them to ask a question, they get pissed off because they actually have to work for their money. They treat me like garbage.

10) I’ve made formal complaints, but no one working in the metro system seems to give a damn. Surprise surprise.

And the list goes on and on……

For a system that's only been around for a few decades, its horribly poor performance is uncanny. I pay an inordinate amount of money for terrible service, but unfortunately, metro’s got a nice monopoly going on so I’m completely dependent on it to get to my job in downtown DC. Now that I know so much of my money is going towards pension plans for rude and lazy employees, I can feel my blood boil.

Dear Ms. Carol D. Kissel, Assistant General Manager and Chief Financial Officer for metro, YOU CAN GO KISSEL MY A$$.
1 reply · active 694 weeks ago
You need to do what I did, and start driving. The improvement in the quality of my life is absolutely worth the money.
aergweherwg's avatar

aergweherwg · 694 weeks ago

Meow!

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter