Thursday, February 3, 2011

"Plenty of Room for Other Names"



On Jan. 31, at Metro center, Metro unveiled its new memorial pylon dedicated to the 26 employees who've died on the job. It seemed like a respectful and long-needed gesture to the fallen, but as often the case with Metro, carelessness has at least one Metro employee and the widow of another upset at the transit authority.

Here's the veteran employee's take via email:
I stopped by the Metro Memorial today to see the names of friends and ended up rolling my eyes.

There are three names on the newly unveiled WMATA memorial that have something in common to those who knew them:
  • They worked for the same department: Automatic Train Control (ATC)
  • They had the same pay grade and level of expertise: AA Techs
  • They were all killed on the Red Line, or to WMATA workers, the A line.
  • They were fixing faulty track circuits
  • With regards to ATC duties, they had the same job.
Yet, when one reads their names on the memorial, two are listed as mechanics (they were killed in the same incident in 2010), and the other as technician.

How can this be?

It is very probable the titles that were etched on the memorial were copied from newspaper articles.

The Washington Post has Jong Lee identified as a technician and other media identified Jeffrey Garrard and Sung Oh as mechanics.

Neither Metro nor the union could get this one right.

It is in these small gaps in attention to detail that safety and worker motivation reside.

It is a reflection of the callous and incompetent leadership--from both camps--that makes up the work environment in which all three died.

The pylon is just another place for drunks to pee on, with plenty of room for other names.
Unsuck reached out to Grace Garrard, the widow of Jeffrey Garrard, to get her thoughts.

She said she was surprised at the distinction in job titles because, she felt, her late husband would have wanted to be memorialized as a technician, not a mechanic.

"I never had any input," she said.

Garrard said that "mechanic" is a generic title, like saying "troops," and lacks any distinction of experience or skill. She said the memorial should have reflected the job titles the fallen would have preferred "because it gives them the respect they're due."

Unsuck has confirmed with a former Metro technician that the distinction, which perhaps doesn't seem important to those who don't work at Metro, is in fact a point of pride among Metro workers. Technicians, they said, have more specialized training, and the title is generally held in higher regard than mechanic, a blanket title.

After the ceremony, the difference in job titles among the three killed workers was enough to prompt Garrard to call Metro to find out why there was a lack of consistency.

"I called and asked the memorial coordinator at Metro if the committee involved in creating the memorial had family members on it, and they didn't know," she said, adding that at the very least, Metro could have reached out to family members to seek input.

She said she would have told Metro the memorial is "not very well lit and that the memorial is not just for me, but for the other employees to see that Metro cares. It should also be a reminder to Metro customers that there are people out there working in dangerous positions so that they get to work."

She added that it's reflective of Metro "not to involve key players into the decision making process."

Comments (22)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
/facepalm
Wow! A new low. Unbelievable.
Jackie Jeter was a heavily involved with this process. No wonder it got screwed up... unbelievable....
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
If you believe in proofreading and caring about the wishes of the dead and the input of the widow, you believe in SLAVERY
Pathetic. Why is this at Metro Center, not WMATA? Wouldn't THAT be a better reminder to employees?
anonymous's avatar

anonymous · 738 weeks ago

This is inexcusable. Why would someone like Jeter and her husband is in maintenance err like this?

Maybe that is why she is not enfranchised with getting it right because she highlights certain employees.

In one incident I heard a door which had been reported to MOC before was not fixed when the wind flung open the door hitting a person and threw hat person into an oncoming train
Par for the course.

How's this for a new slogan?

WMATA: Lowering expectations since 1976!
hrh king friday 13's avatar

hrh king friday 13 · 738 weeks ago

Good work Jeter-ites. Looks like you pissed all over that too.
anonymous's avatar

anonymous · 738 weeks ago

You had me at memorial pylon....only metro
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Good to see I wasn't the only one thinking that. Never mind how bad it is that they screwed it up, but the fact that you've had so many employees die on the job (particularly within the last decade), that you feel the need for a memorial pylon, speaks an awful lot about the organization.
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 738 weeks ago

Pathetic. Just simply pathetic. Can't even respect their own correctly, let alone riders.
Terri Ble's avatar

Terri Ble · 738 weeks ago

Wow. Metro screwed up yet again. Shocker. *sigh*
Does anyone know what happened to all these drivers who struck these employees to kill or injure them?

Were the employees that struck them charged at all with a crime? Do they still work there? Does anyone care?
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
probably promoted... Jackie Jeter's rules...
Yes -- absolutely nothing, at least in the vast majority of cases.

Take the most recent two deaths, Sung Oh and Jeff Garrard. To the best of my knowledge not only do all four (4) of the workers who were in the hi-rail truck that struck them still work for Metro (the driver may have quit/retired voluntarily), so do the people who were working at Central Control (OCC) that night. It was OCC that instructed the operator of that truck to travel in reverse, with no backup alarm, against the normal flow of traffic (from Shady Grove toward Rockville on the outbound track), without notifying either the ATC crew (Oh and Garrard) or the Track crew in the truck of the presence of the other crew. OCC knew full well Garrard and Oh were there -- they had communicated via radio and, because Garrard and Oh were replacing an impedance bond, at least two (2) track circuits were 'down' (showing occupancy). IOW -- it would have appeared to OCC that there was a train or piece of track equipment there! In addition, Oh and Garrard had followed proper procedure and installed slow speed restrictions in their work area, which are _also_ visible at OCC! They would have had a better chance with a crack addict at Central that night.

Actions really do speak louder than words. A memorial is a nice gesture, but the hard cold fact is that Oh and Garrard were killed due primarily to multiple errors made by the personnel at OCC that night. As far as I know, they were never even disciplined, let alone fired and charged with negligent homicide.

Regarding criminal charges, it turns out that employees (of any company that has Workers' Comp insurance) are protected from any legal action if they were "acting in their official capacity" at the time of the accident/incident. Basically the equivalent of diplomatic immunity.

The bottom line is that Metro personnel can and do commit manslaughter and negligent homicide with impunity. I wouldn't be surprised if one or more of the people at OCC that night have already been promoted. If you're a big enough screw-up you get a promotion -- it's the Metro way.
Were the people named Dodson in the second picture family members?
Corresponding Toads's avatar

Corresponding Toads · 738 weeks ago

Yo Unsuck, be sure to let us know if they fix the titles on the pylon.

P.S. I require more vespene gas.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
hrh king friday 13's avatar

hrh king friday 13 · 738 weeks ago

P.S.S. My life for Aiur.
When do they unveil a memorial to the riders and pedestrians who have given their lives for Metro's negligence?
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Just came here to ask that same question. . .
Yet again, this sensationalistic site finds a way to make something negative out of something positive that Metro does. Way to go - I hope you're proud of your snarky selves.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Most of the post was actually comments made by Jeff Garrard's widow and an employee who said:

"I stopped by the Metro Memorial today to see the names of friends and ended up rolling my eyes."

Are you suggesting that their feelings aren't legitimate and/or that their comments are 'snarky'?

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter