Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Another Point of View on Broken Escalators


Via @ Graffiti on the metro. "What's going on here? Sheer incompetence!"

This is from a group of private escalator and elevator contractors with skin in the game, but since we usually only ever hear Metro's side via their massive PR machine and much of the local media, I think it's fair to hear the other side as well. Remember how Metro handles escalator problems.

What do you think?
Metro elevators and escalators are often in the news but never for the right reasons.

Decisions were made years ago for WMATA to maintain 100 percent of Metro's elevators and escalators by WMATA's own mechanics. This is the primary reason for today's dire state of repair. Decisions are again being made that will either signal WMATA's decision to recover the public's trust and safety or to continue down a road to even less dependable elevators and escalators. WMATA needs to ultimately put 100 percent of the elevator and escalator maintenance out to bid to private contractors.

Recently, WMATA showed an interest in making a shift to private contractors as they were accepting proposals to maintain approximately 250 elevators and escalators. The request has devastatingly changed to around only 80 units. This represents a small fraction of the total number of elevators and escalators in the Metro system and is not an acceptable start to correcting this vexing problem.

The reasons for the continued reliance on Metro's own mechanics is clear - more jobs and bigger budgets.

WMATA currently has over 200 full time positions dedicated to the Elevator/Escalator maintenance program and maintain availability rates of around 85 percent. Prior to the early 90s, private contractors took care of all of Metro's elevators/escalators with fewer than 70 mechanics and frequented 97 percent availability.

Private contractors performed better with less manpower while costing riders and taxpayers less.

When private contractors work for WMATA they are given incentives for proper performance and disincentives for poor performance. Contractors who repeatedly perform poorly get replaced. Financial incentives are given to contractors for escalator reliability over 90 percent and elevator availability for over 97 percent. These are benchmarks that WMATA's own mechanics will never obtain and honestly, they have no incentive to do so. WMATA mechanics are handicapped by a number of factors that will prevent them from ever performing as well as private contractors regularly do.

Mechanics for private contractors that don't perform get fired. Big Incentive. Mechanics for WMATA that don't perform keep working. No incentive. Additionally, WMATA mechanics under the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) contract have what is called a “pick system.” Every six months senior mechanics get to pick the stations they work in while displacing less senior mechanics that have potentially worked hard to keep their units running. This leads to a culture of unmotivated senior mechanics that rotate from station to station while removing incentives for mechanics that have a desire to perform well.

Private contractors have no seniority and no “pick system.” The best jobs go to the most qualified and hardworking people.

These qualified mechanics work for the companies that research, develop, design, build, install, service/repair and maintain all of the elevators and escalators around the world. Before working on elevator and escalators in the field, each mechanic completes a nationally recognized elevator/escalator education program, the National Elevator Industry Education Program (NEIEP.) This is the elevator/escalator education program that 100 percent of the contractors who design, build and install elevator and escalators in the USA rely upon.

Years ago WMATA started its own elevator and escalator training program. WMATA probably told us something about how “Metro escalators” are different than in the mall or airport because some are really long. Well no, no they’re not. There are many different manufactures and various different installations of escalators across the country but there are also people trained to work on them. In fact, there are about 1,200 people who do this work in the metro DC area everyday.

WMATA's training program is on timeout right now. Why? We don't know. But don't worry they are going to get it started again. Along with this comes a need to hire more staff and increase budgets. This will be the next official “solution” to fix Metro's elevators and escalators. What have they been doing for the past 20 years? Let's now offer job advancement to ATU members and train them to be entry-level elevator and escalator mechanics. We'll just throw some more money and more members at it and “one day” the problems will go away. Magic!

Let's not, the NEIEP training program is privately funded, provides results and already has a workforce in place.

WMATA has a prolonged history of continuing to present the next big “solution.” They started with an availability rate of up to 97 percent and gave us a “solution” of creating an elevator and escalator maintenance department for their ATU members. Now we frequently have less that 85 percent reliability and numerous high profile accidents.

WMATA then has a “solution” called increased staffing. More jobs and bigger budgets but of course without better results.

WMATA again has a “solution” named capital improvement. The public is told that parts are unavailable and therefore elevators and escalators need to be replaced. Interpret this as an inability to keep their elevators and escalators in good working order from a lack of proper maintenance and a lie as elevator and escalator parts are readily available from numerous sources.

WMATA uses capital improvement as an opportunity to bring in private contractors to install new or to refurbish units where they have failed to maintain them. This is nothing more than an attempt to get the public off their backs for a while as they are throwing a bunch of money at their mistakes and promise that “one day” the problems will all be solved. Magic!

After private contractors finish rebuilding Metro's elevators and escalators the cycle will repeat. Poor maintenance, reduced product life-cycle, more excuses and expense for the public. Not a solution.

Over 1,200 experienced mechanics are employed in this area and are immediately available to go to work properly maintaining and repairing Metro's elevators and escalators. This is the only real solution.

Do we want WMATA do continue to hire people who are guaranteed a job for life in a department with a losing track record? Do we want to be told about more “solutions” on top of past “solutions” when we have already seen the success produced when private contractors took care of WMATA's elevators and escalators?

We encourage the WMATA board and General Manager Sarles to do the right thing and increase the amount of elevator and escalator maintenance that is going out to bid to private contractors. The “next solution” propaganda needs to stop and Metro needs real solutions with real results. It's time to again have qualified elevator and escalator mechanics maintaining Metro's elevators and escalators.
Other items:
More fraud, waste and abuse (WTOP)
Metrobus use surges, rail lags (Examiner)

Comments (36)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
While the benefits of going to a private contractor may be overstated by its advocates, it is definitely superior to WMATA doing this on their own based on what we see every day.

WMATA's own system encourages pathetic. At the very least, if private contractors are not allowed, WMATA needs to change the pick system. Unfortunately, that's a road down slavery in the minds of the union.
3 replies · active 668 weeks ago
Jackie Jeter's avatar

Jackie Jeter · 668 weeks ago

Our members go to work every day cognizant of their responsibility to perform a job on behalf of our customers – the riding public.
MetroRider's avatar

MetroRider · 668 weeks ago

They may be cognizant of their responsibility, but that doesn't mean they're willing to follow through.
Everything is fine. Our people do wonderfully...blah, blah, blah.
foobar1234's avatar

foobar1234 · 668 weeks ago

Contractors vs. employees is not the argument. Competence, training, and doing the job right the first time are the issues. The government is full of terrible examples of contractors gone wild with cost plus or profit defined contracts and all sorts of other wasteful examples of spending. Similarly, I can hear the echo of unions and incompetent people on the payroll of Metro not doing the job.

This writer has a point-of-view in favor of contractors as the solution.

I believe the solution is better management, better people (whether they are employees or contractors), and a system that rewards good work while punishing poor performance. Unfortunately such systems are rarely seen in the public sector.
5 replies · active 667 weeks ago
This is right. Neither solution is a panacea. Clearly what Metro is doing does not work well. But private contractors could just as easily have cost overruns and crappy work.
Absolutely. There is a real danger that if WMATA uses private contractors, it will hire a well-connected or management crony contractor under a system that provides no incentives for the contractor to perform better than the ATU mechanics do now.

But it doesn't have to be this way. WMATA needs competent, capable, non-corrupt management who can be trusted to structure contracts appropriately so that whoever is responsible for escalators and elevators is incentivized to keep them running, not under repair, i.e. cost-minus if certain (tough) reliability targets are not achieved, and appropriate bonuses if they are. And they should be based on a metric like @FixWMATA's "station fail" rate, so that credit for keeping escalators operating is only given when every single escalator in a station is serving customers as an escalator, not a stairway.
So what is the solution? I'm as pro-union as I can be, but maybe Metro needs to negotiate new work rules and even be willing to let the workers strike to get the system to work better. (As a side benefit, a strike will let us see how accurate the 200K "World without metro" study really is.
Give each line to a different contractor on a 1 year contract with an option to cancel with 30 days notice at anytime. Those who succeed stay, those who fail get the boot.

The escalators in the airport always work. Somebody in town must be competent. We know what the METRO success rate is.
That isn't entirely fair. The Metro escalators are partially outside. You can't expect the same failure rate comparing the two story escalator drop inside at national and the journey to the middle of the earth at Dupont while being rained on.
woe is metro's avatar

woe is metro · 668 weeks ago

We're talking about a platform that either hydraulically moves up and down or cyclically - but three months to replace parts?? These mechanics can learn a thing or two from the thousands of airline mechanics that keep 500k lb. jets in the sky 24 hours a day.
1 reply · active 667 weeks ago
That's a very compelling argument. Obviously, what WMATA is doing is not working. I hope WMATA is open to considering this solution.
At Eastern Market, I don't understand the sign saying that the escalator will be fixed at a certain time. The one side was supposed to be fixed by March. It was done in May. It was running for a few days before they started working on the other side which is "supposed" to be done in July. This forced the "fixed" side to be used as stairs. If the "fixed" escalator is not running shouldn't we have been told July from day 1. It doesn't really matter that it was finished in May if it is only used as stairs.
4 replies · active 667 weeks ago
Can UNSUCK or someone confirm that? If that's true, a horrible statistical manipulation.
I'd like to see the formula. If the escalator is supposed to run for 20 hours a day but it shuts down every day for 30 minutes does that mean it is 98% avail? NO it's broken everyday=FAIL!
WMATA should really give this a try. Things might likely improve since it is hard to imagine the situation getting any worse.
Why does Metro choose to fix escalators slowly in multiple places rather than attack just a few and finish the job quickly? Perhaps there is an engineering reason that I don't understand as to why a short one-story escalator needs to be fixed slowly by a couple of people rather than fixed quickly by a team of people?
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
That's not accurate.
4 replies · active 668 weeks ago
Your mom's not accurate.
Everly Anon's avatar

Everly Anon · 668 weeks ago

You again? Allow me to parrot my comment of yesterday. Care to clarify? (You do realize a vague comment like that has no meaning nor weight without some type of factual backup to it?)
MetroRider's avatar

MetroRider · 668 weeks ago

It's a joke -- wmata tweeted it to a rider a few days ago. No explanation, just the brush off.
Everly Anon's avatar

Everly Anon · 668 weeks ago

oh? I gotta remember that one. :D
Discussion about private contractors always reminds me of this scene from Clerks:

Randal Graves: [talking about the second Death Star] A construction job of that magnitude would require a helluva lot more manpower than the Imperial army had to offer. I'll bet there were independent contractors working on that thing: plumbers, aluminum siders, roofers.

Dante Hicks: Not just Imperials, is what you're getting at...

Randal Graves: Exactly. In order to get it built quickly and quietly they'd hire anybody who could do the job. Do you think the average storm trooper knows how to install a toilet main? All they know is killing and white uniforms.

Dante Hicks: All right, so even if independent contractors are working on the Death Star, why are you uneasy with its destruction?

Randal Graves: All those innocent contractors hired to do a job were killed - casualties of a war they had nothing to do with.
From the lower rail ridership article: "Some commuters also may have cut back on Metrorail use when federal transit benefits dropped from a maximum of $230 per month to $125 per month on Jan. 1, opting for cheaper bus trips or other options as gas prices rose. The Washington region has an unusually high concentration of riders using the federal transit benefits."

I've always believed one of the major reasons metro gets away with incompetence is that many people are riding for free. If everyone had to actually pay their own fares I would think we as riders would be a larger, more organized voice. If I'm riding free I likely don't feel like I have as much a right to complain, I mean it sucks, but it's free, right? I pay full fare, $11 something round trip each day for this mess.
5 replies · active 668 weeks ago
You got that wrong. Federal workers do not ride for free. I'm a fderal contractor and I get the SmartTrip benefit. I am not given money for travel. I have $125 pretax dollars deducted from my paycheck and automatically put on my card on the first of the month. I'm still paying for Metro, but I'm getting a small break since it's pre-tax. Now that $125 is the max, I have to add money to my card at least once a month.
I dont think Metroed was refering to contractors... I believe they were refering to the people who receive their checks from Uncle Sam.
I'm pretty sure their Metro benefit is the same.
VeteranRider's avatar

VeteranRider · 668 weeks ago

This federal worker receives his transit benefit for free - I do not have any of my own money deducted. Transit given to me by my agency, as a tax-free benefit that is unrelated to salary. However I have to justify it - part of the application is a calculation of how much I need based on my real commute. I live fairly close to work so my trip is not as costly as it might be, therefore I receive a transit beneft of $90 per month; other riders can receive up to the $125 max based on their actual commute. (And if I do not use the entire $90 in a given month, I forfeit the unused portion.)
I expect to re-apply once the new fares are in place, and may see an change in my monthly benefit - however, due to the elimination of Peak of the Peak, it is possible my fare and my benefit will NOT increase - and it might even go down.
(This is how my agency handles it; it may be different at other agencies. )
That is so true. It is the Federal workers fault that Metro is so bad.
metro is only allowed to hire so many contractors a year . they federal and local governments regulate all of that. And from my experience most mechanical contractors are just as bad as any other mechanic
1 reply · active 667 weeks ago
Assuming that mechanical contractors are equivalent to other mechanics, can you explain why elevator and escalators that were maintained by contractors worked much better, and why when Metro brought that work in-house, the rate of failure jumped? I have ridden Metro for 22 years, and have tracked the performance declines daily. The contractors did a far better job, and by that metric alone, Metro should reinstate them.
Frank Doule's avatar

Frank Doule · 667 weeks ago

I think at this point Metro should just take a clue from the escalators at the Subway stations in Hong Kong.

They put a sign saying "Not in use, Energy Savings" when they are shut down at odd hours...of course, they are probably telling the truth. Some people here might buy it though!

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter