Monday, June 4, 2012

Bad Radios Strike Again



Metro's dysfunctional radio system contributed to the death of two Metro workers and the derailment of a train, according to National Transportation Safety Board reports released Friday.

In the death of two Automatic Train Control workers on Jan. 26, 2010, the NTSB concluded the following:
Had the Operations Control Center (OCC) operators provided the crew of striking hi-rail vehicle 15802 with the cell phone number of the first automatic train control technician and instructions to coordinate their work, the accident could have been prevented.
The cell phone number the NTSB refers to is a PERSONAL cell phone number, sources said.

Sources within Metro say that in many cases, the PERSONAL cell phones are the primary means of communications because the radio system is so bad.

Metro has a multimillion dollar radio system that doesn't work, and they are depending on personal cell phone coverage, in many cases, for the safety of their employees. That had disastrous results that January night at Rockville.

Screwed up radios also played a role in the Farragut North derailment, according to the NTSB, which concluded "the probable cause of the accident was the train operator's failure to follow proper operating procedures, which resulted in her operating the train past a red signal and over the interconnected derail."

But when you read the details, poor communications surely added significantly to a very stressful situation in which an operator, who'd been out on worker's comp for nine years, had their decisions clouded by spotty communications with OCC.

Here's what the NTSB had to say:
The operator of train 641 stopped the train and called the OCC for permission to proceed, as required. However, the operator experienced difficulty communicating with the OCC; she reportedly was "calling and calling and calling." Moreover, the train operator reported that she heard the OCC controller respond to train 156, but the radio messages were garbled and she could not understand the instructions.
The bottom line:
Radio records show communications between the OCC controllers and various train operators. Radio transmissions from train 156 to the OCC were weak and garbled at times. The operator of train 156 had a train-mounted radio and a portable radio; neither radio was reported to be malfunctioning.
According to several sources within Metro, the radio problems are only getting worse.

Time and time again, EVERY SINGLE Metro worker I talk to says the radios (here, here and here) cause or compound all the delays, accidents--everything. They can't communicate among themselves, which makes it hard to communicate with us.

Several employees have said Metro knows the radios are wired incorrectly yet management does nothing about it. Specifically, the wires don't have the capacity to handle the information passing through them.

"It's like trying to suck a golf ball through a garden hose," said one employee.

Said another, "It doesn't make sense to rely on personal cell phones at critical times. How's your personal cell phone coverage in Metro? I bet it's better than Metro's radios. That's not comforting to me."

There's so much in these reports to latch onto, and I recommend anyone with an interest in Metro read them.

For example, in the $9 million collision at the West Falls Church rail yard, the NTSB concluded "the failure of the train operator to control the movement of his train as it approached the standing train, possibly due to his fatigue" was the cause.

Amazingly, despite two killed and millions of dollars in damage, the NTSB issued no recommendations for Metro despite compelling evidence that the faulty radios contributed to two of the three incidents.

Another little tidbit about the reports that may only be of interest to me as a journalist is the timing of their release. As anyone knows, if you want to release bad news, do it on a Friday afternoon. Why the NTSB would, in essence, help Metro by doing that I couldn't say.

Think about that next time you ride.

As the bodies and wreckage pile up, there's still no one watching Metro. Quite the contrary, by issuing damning reports on a Friday afternoon, the NTSB may actually be enabling Metro by shielding it from the spotlight.

Other items:
Metro blocked, locked emergency exits (Examiner)

Comments (25)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
So this inability to communicate will lead to another disaster, and when we try to flee from it, we'll be blocked by the locked emergency exits and sinkholes waiting for us on the escape path.

The future is dying on Metro.
It is not the NTSB's fault, they are only able to suggest things to metro rather than mandate them. Nobody oversees metro, they have sovereign immunity.
fasdfasf's avatar

fasdfasf · 668 weeks ago

the NTSB can't "crack down" on Metro. No one can, which is exactly the problem. The NTSB could be a better advocate for the masses that rely on Metro though. Glad they look into this stuff but to sneak it out the back door on a Friday is pretty bad.
I think that people are taking sovereign immunity way too far. Individuals cannot sue Metro due to the sovereign immunity that Maryland, Virginia, and DC has extended to Metro, but the federal government can bring a case against Metro since the US is the superior sovereign.

The NTSB has no power to force *ANY* organization or government to impose their recommendations. It's not just Metro. It takes a federal agency to force an entity to take on the recommendations of NTSB, and they would normally do it by stripping the entity of whatever license they have to operate.
That's not accurate.
2 replies · active 668 weeks ago
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 668 weeks ago

Care to clarify then?
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 668 weeks ago

And you know this how?
Vienna Bound's avatar

Vienna Bound · 668 weeks ago

Does Metro require employees/operaters to provide personal cell phone numbers to managment and carry them? Seems to me, personal cell phones (even when improperly being used while driving a train) are personal and should not be used for official business unless Metro subsidizes the cost to carry and us them for official communication.
2 replies · active 668 weeks ago
Exactly, providing your cell number to your employer is reasonable. If they make it a business practice to rely on it I would expect them to pay for it.

BTW, what do they do about operators who do not have a personal cell phone with them? Scold them?
there are a few groups of rail employees who are issued cell phones for work use. we are told to use these when needed. we all agree the phones were issued because everyone knows the radio system does not work in a lot of the system. the cell phones do not work in a lot of the system as well. so some of us carry digital and analog radios and cell phones. even with three modes of communication there are still major gaps in coverage.
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 668 weeks ago

Not surprising. Got a very kind thank-you from the Cap South kiosk fellow when I explained a tree was on the tracks this past Friday (as I was bolting a dead Metro system for other means). He confessed they knew nothing so I shared what the train operator had said. He started passing it along to other customers, appearing somewhat relieved to have at least a clue about the situation.
knows metro's avatar

knows metro · 668 weeks ago

The employee cell phone arrangement is informal. Often the radio will be tried, and then when it doesn't work we'll move to the cell phones if there's coverage.

this post is dead on.
horseydeucey's avatar

horseydeucey · 668 weeks ago

It's common enough to see people posting comments here along the lines of, "one day someone will die because of Metro's failings."
It has happened more than once, more than twice, and will likely happen again.
So, what now?
What's going to change?
How will it change?
Anyone?
4 replies · active 668 weeks ago
Stan Dessel's avatar

Stan Dessel · 668 weeks ago

f*ck off
It's going to take an act of Congress. If they are willing to meddle in the matters of Metro when it comes to naming a stop on the Blue/Yellow line, surely they should meddle on safety matters, especially since the 7000-Series cars will proudly display "America's Metro" on them.

I'm not trying to be a smart-aleck--I'm just being realistic when it comes to forcing change on Metro.
former employee's avatar

former employee · 668 weeks ago

Need a politician who has balls to stand up to Metro on behalf of the taxpayers. I encourage writing to every policitian telling them you want reform within Metro. It is damn shame that tax dollars being poured in this system that the riding public has to gamble thier safety for a ride to make a honest living. Flood with emails, phone calls... start a petiton.

Metro mgmt. needs to be dismantle --thats where the major problem lies. Until then, workers and riders with continue to suffer.
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 668 weeks ago

Well, I was relying on the Mayan calendar but apparently that's not going to happen either.... ;D
...and this is why I drive everywhere.
given this, and the morning paper's announcement that metro was aware that safety exits had been locked or blocked for years, how is metro not the subject of major civil lawsuits? they've literally killed people with negligence!
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 668 weeks ago

My guess is the people who would be in those suits do not have the money for the lawyers to make it happen. My second guess is Metro is well aware of this fact.
Sovereign immunity may exist for Metro, but change can happen if governments had the backbone to withhold the purse strings from WMATA. Demand accountability by saying no money.

Unfortunately, anyone who ever threatens to withhold money from Metro is labeled anti-transit or wanting to remove local control (like McDonnell). Or in the case of Democrats, it could be a death knell in a primary to be anti-union. McDonnell is getting what he wants on the Silver Line by withholding money. Whatever you think of his anti-union crusade, it shows that money talks and can get change to happen. We just need him to demand accountability on the system as it exists already. And the same goes for the O'Malley, the DC Council and the federal government.

Local control isn't always the greatest thing in the world, especially when you're dealing with the same types of people who took the District to the brink in the 1990s and therefore had to be taken over. I mean, look at the D.C. board. It's filled with corrupt and incompetent members, but they keep getting voted in over and over.
Unless you have direct substantiated knowledge that the NTSB was deliberately trying to mislead the public/hide/dump the report on that particular day so it would be overlooked, please don't make those types of accusations.

I work for another government agency, and have found that there is little control/flexibility on the timing of the release of those kinds of reports. Yes it was unfortunate that the release of this report got lost in the chaos of Friday's weather, but we haven't learned to control the weather (yet!). Most likely, the NTSB had finally completed all of the internal reviews and signoffs needed to get the report out and it published the report. That's all, no conspiracy (this time).

They are doing the best they can with the resources and staff that they have, this is an underfunded, understaffed agency (and likely to continue that way unless the US finds the hidden pot of gold and all of our budget woes are cured).

I'm not trying to be an apologist for the NTSB, Metro (or the g'ment), and know that politicians/agencies orchestrate release of information to minimize converge, but this isn't one of those times when it would benefit anyone.

Thanks again to UnSuckDC, FIXWMATA, etc for continuing to alert the riding public and doing the job that the mainstream media should be doing, it's sad to see what's become of some our local "news" outlets. But at least the information is getting out there and we can use the information to protect ourselves and fellow riders.
1 reply · active 668 weeks ago
Didn't say they did, but that it's fishy given the date the reports were finalized.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter