Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Metro's New Openness: Delayed, Disrupted and Offloaded

Someone over at Metro really doesn't want to follow the GM's advice to be open and honest with riders about problems.

Back in August, we asked Metro about severe slowdowns between East Falls Church and West Falls Church that had been reported by several riders.

Metro gave a vague answer that made the slowdowns seem like nothing to worry about.

Well take a look at what they have to say now:
Trains to share one track between the West Falls Church-VT/UVA and East Falls Church Metrorail stations on weekdays

Orange Line trains will share one track for four hours a day between the West Falls Church-VT/UVA and East Falls Church Metrorail stations on weekdays between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. from Sept. 27 through Oct. 8, because Metro will install new cross ties and new rail in that area to improve service reliability by allowing trains to operate at normal speeds.

Metro has identified an immediate need to replace cross ties and upgrade its track between these two rail stations. By completing these necessary repairs, Metro will be able remove speed restrictions that are currently in place between these stations.

Metrorail customers traveling between these stations should not anticipate any delays because trains operate approximately every 12 minutes during this time frame.

To alert customers about this upcoming daytime work, Metro will make train and system announcements, issue e-alerts and post signs at the affected stations.
We confirmed with Metro that the August slowdowns and the newly announced daytime track work are related. The slowdowns have been ongoing, to varying degrees, all this time, according to rider CS.

Way to communicate with your passengers in an open and honest way, Metro. Were the ties and track issues immediate or not? Was it ever dangerous? How come all on-train announcements made by operators during the past 6 weeks seemed purposely vague? Why didn't you tell riders what was going on?

This is the third case this month in which Metro appears to be hiding things.

There's the ongoing struggle to get information about doors, automatic train control and the bellying of the 1000-series cars; Metro's reluctance to talk about a recent incident in which the doors of a train were opened over the third rail; and finally, Metro's BS implying there had never been issues of 4000-series car doors opening while the train was in motion.

Next time we hear an innocuous sounding announcement from Metro, we're going to wonder what's really going on.

Other items:

Comments (15)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
FIRE SARLES!

Federal takeover of the system NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!!!

Union members, oust Jeter!

We need reform and we need it last year.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Fire David Lacosse too!
Corresponding Toads's avatar

Corresponding Toads · 756 weeks ago

I'm glad Metro keeps me in the dark about things like this. I'm just tryin' to get to work, ya know? If I'm gonna die on the way, I'd rather it be a surprise.
Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous · 756 weeks ago

I'm going to venture a guess here that it's not Metro's PR department that's at fault here. THey're likely getting cut off from information from another group inside Metro that really does have something to hide. Just a guess, but after seeing the quality of Metros pr resopnses, i'd say they're in the dark too
Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous · 756 weeks ago

Ok so I absolutely hate to defend metro because they really don't deserve it but the blurb about $700,000 to print 10,000 copies is misleading. If you read the request it is for money to do a complete rewrite of the rules and regulations for Metrorail. Granted they won't end up actually following any of them but it's a lot more than just printing costs.

Now for some metro bashing! Metro wtf is up with the lying? I mean really, we all knew there was something wrong with that section of track but you couldn't be bothered to just tell the truth. We're adults (well most of us) and can handle it. Oh and fix the damn PIDS already would you!
What about the speed restrictions between Rosslyn and Foggy Bottom, why isn't metro communicating about this? These speed restrictions have been in place for well over a year.
3 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
GlenmontGirl's avatar

GlenmontGirl · 756 weeks ago

The closest to an "answer" that I've ever heard is that the slowdowns are due to volume in the Rosslyn tunnel. I'm pretty sure I read it in a Washington Post article about the proposed re-structuring of the lines (they were/are planning to send blue line trains across the blue-yellow bridge to L'Enfant Plaza to ease the Rosslyn tunnel congestion).

I don't believe it, though. Especially not after reading this.
Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous · 756 weeks ago

I've wondered the same exact thing. Every trip, when you leave Rosslyn, about 30 seconds later, you will slow down and almost stop...then travel slowly for a while, and then pick up speed.

Never have I heard an explanation.

GlenmontGirl...that is a different question. You're talking about outside Rossyln (i.e., Courthouse-Rosslyn and Arl. Cemetery-Rosslyn).
You are correct, the item raised by GlenmontGirl is a different issue. There is some type of track problem or circuit problem between Rosslyn and Foggy Bottom that metro isn't telling riders about.
Seriously, the problem with the PIDs is just a computer glitch. Of course WMATA knows where the trains are. They wouldn't lie about something like that, would they? Really, what's the worst that could happen?

Is it a good sign for WMATA / the economy that four times in two weeks I have been passed by my bus (J2/J3 in Montgomery County) because it has been too full to take on passengers? This hadn't happened in the previous two years.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
It's happened to me before. Back in Snowmageddon (hours before it began) I took the JS to physical therapy a few weeks after surgery. As I waited for a return J2 or J3 east to Silver Spring, 6 J2's passed me headed west. None returned. I ended up walking to Montgomery Mall, jumping on empty bus about to leave and demanded a supervisor. I ended up waiting twenty minutes (none came) before abandoning my takeover of the metro bus for a Ride-on to Grovesnor.

The J line needs dedciated lanes along East West Highway.
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 756 weeks ago

Oh the PIDs are part of the solution eh? Yesterday as I walked down to the Ballston platform the sign read "train - 2 minutes." Got to the bottom as the train was dinging the doors shut... pulled out. I watched the monitor. Still 2 minutes. (Last time there really was another train 2 minutes out.) As I watched, it dropped to 1... then a few seconds later dropped to "boarding." No train in the station... then the next numbers moved up and not one of those second two had changed their times at all.

If they can't count seconds, how can they count budget?
FIRE DAVID LACOSSE!!!!!!
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
All4Lacosse's avatar

All4Lacosse · 756 weeks ago

No way dude.
GlenmontGirl's avatar

GlenmontGirl · 756 weeks ago

Why can't they just be honest? They could even take a leaf out of the politicians' books and blame their predecessors. Sarles could just have a press conference, honestly tell people that the system is in bad shape, and outline Metro's plans to fix it. If we believe the press release then they are doing something about it. Why couldn't they have told us about this months ago?

The scariest thing about this is that Falls Church isn't the only location where slowdowns have been in effect for a while with no explanations. Scott mentioned the Rosslyn Tunnel earlier. There is also a slowdown between Brookland and Fort Totten, during the section where the track tilts at a really weird angle, and the train tilts with it.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter