
Check out this quote from the City Paper:
“It used to be that you could learn a lot about Metro by reading the Post. That’s not what the newspaper is doing anymore,” Zimmerman says. “…The Examiner isn’t interested in Metro getting better, it’s interested in having something to kick. It’s an ideological mission for them. And I think the Post is just looking for a headline that will allow them to sell past the Examiner.”What sorts of stories would Chris like to see in the press? Should the 6/22 articles have been headlined along the lines of "Hundreds Survive Metro Crash?" Should the Ludwig story be recast as a rider-friendly cost cutting move that saved Metro money? What about all of the willfully dangerous driving/criminal incidents? Should those stories have been spun to say that Metro is committed to the development of its workforce? C'mon!
If anything the press is and has been too soft on Metro. Besides, if Zimmerman wants affirmation for the "great" job he's doing, he knows where to go.
Chris should have followed the advice of an old saying: "Tis better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
Anon · 760 weeks ago
Metro User · 760 weeks ago
Ever and Anon · 760 weeks ago
Now I ponder the question Unsuck asked above. New headlines:
"Metro Helps Ailing Former Employee Reach Heaven! St. Peter Says Thanks!"
"Metro On Top of the Obesity Issue - Sweat it out of them via costs and heat!"
"Metro Eyeing Ways to Reduce Overpopulation With Rail Crash Techniques!"
Doctors Laud New Patient Strategies - Metro Sending More Sprains Via Escalator Closures!"
Guest · 760 weeks ago
Corresponding Toads · 760 weeks ago
JJx · 760 weeks ago
Matthew · 760 weeks ago
Corresponding Toads · 760 weeks ago
John · 760 weeks ago
Its a shame Metro is wasting money employing PLANTS like you as a PR campaign to go posting in articles. Just shows they care more about PR and denial than actually FIXING THE PROBLEMS!
Unsuck Fan! :-) · 760 weeks ago
Thanks as always, Unsuck!
Kat · 760 weeks ago
Matthew · 760 weeks ago
Anon · 760 weeks ago
unsuckdcmetro 92p · 760 weeks ago
Nolan · 760 weeks ago
I mean, isn't existence of this site proof that the Metro is under-covered by our local media?
Matthew · 760 weeks ago
anonymous · 760 weeks ago
Ever and Anon · 760 weeks ago
dan · 760 weeks ago
So long as WMATA continues to receive guarenteed federal, state, and local funding it will plod along in its hamfisted attempts to right itself.
What is the incentive to improve if they know they can't be shut down, or at least privatized?
DCgrl · 760 weeks ago
king friday 13 · 760 weeks ago
Guest · 760 weeks ago
Fedupwithwhining · 760 weeks ago
Guest · 759 weeks ago
unsuckdcmetro 92p · 759 weeks ago
Fedupwithwhining · 759 weeks ago
unsuckdcmetro 92p · 759 weeks ago
Don't think anyone writing into the blog has ever advocated doing away with the whole system. It's fair to say most want a system that works.
Guest · 759 weeks ago
Arlington Man · 759 weeks ago
DCist · 759 weeks ago
anonyousmoderate · 759 weeks ago
Lefty drones might be 90%+ of DC, but that doesn't mean only the libertarians and conservatives don't want your opinions shoved down our throats.