Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Healthcare Fraud at Metro Under the Microscope


Unsuck DC Metro has learned that Metro, along with ATU 689, has hired an outside contractor to conduct a massive, first-time-ever audit of thousands of current and former Metro workers and their dependents in the hopes or rooting out what is believed to be alarming abuse of Metro healthcare, done largely by adding ineligible people to the plan.

"Although we believe the majority of our enrolled dependents meet our eligibility requirements, there may be some instances when a member mistakenly covers an ineligible dependent," reads the document that was sent to ATU 689 members.

One source we talked to said they knew an employee who openly boasted about having relatives on his plan who should not have been. Another employee, according to the source, said he had an ex-wife and her new family on the plan.

Apparently, and unsurprisingly, Metro has been very lax in updating dependent/spouse information.

One worker we talked to said that every year he gets a letter from the plan asking him if anything has changed in his family situation. The worker, who is divorced, said the year he got divorced he made sure his ex-wife was taken off the plan. But it was all done on an honor system, and he could have easily left her on the plan, and no one would have checked, he said.

"No one is cross checking with public records," they said.

Another source, recently retired from working at Metro headquarters, said:
It doesn't surprise me that HR never bothered to check paperwork on dependents for health insurance. But to give HR a break, the Local 689 healthcare was not administered very much by them, but by the union's own Health and Welfare Office who signed people up and then passed the bill on to Metro. In retrospect, it now occurs to me that the unions didn't have a reason to adequately police the rolls of the insured because some of their members would be getting something extra from big, mean and oh-so-profitable Metro.
Another source said it was commonly known that Health and Welfare office would turn a blind eye to questionable documents regarding dependents.

I called Secova, the outside entity conducting the audit, and was told "some bad apples have spoiled the pie; there were instances of employees claiming brothers and sisters as dependent children."

Two other Metro sources we talked to confirmed health insurance abuse is believed to be widespread.

"There's an ongoing joke around here that some employees will adopt every niece and nephew to load them onto the health insurance," wrote one Metro employee. His sentiments were echoed by another source.

However, one former union president believes the audit is a waste of time.

Mike Golash wrote the following in an email:
This has never been done before, mainly because it was felt to be unnecessary. When an employee is hired he has to document his dependents to get them on the plan. I am sure there are occasions when an employee fails to report a divorce in a timely way or the death of a child or spouse but I have never known of any cases of fraud.

Metro is trying to save money on the cost of health insurance. They feel the audit will do this. I am willing to bet that the cost of the audit will be greater than any money saved by it.

I received the letter. It told me I had to produce a marriage certificate and my 1040 form. I have been married 40 years and have no idea where my marriage certificate it, so it is somewhat of an inconvenience.
The recently retired source, who is very familiar with Metro's finances and auditing processes didn't think the audit would make any difference.
Don't expect much [to come from the audit]! If the problem is too big, it'll be swept under the rug for fear of antagonizing Local 689. My guess is that they'll make an example of a couple of mechanics to show some effort and then it will go back to business as usual, hoping that the public will be more interested in screwed-up elevators than in girlfriends' kids on the Metro health insurance dime.
Sounds like pretty much the way Metro handles everything.

(Here's a list of the contributions employees make the the various plans, along with Metro's contribution.)

Other items:
Examiner picks up RAC story

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Nothing to see here, Move along ....

"Don't expect much [to come from the audit]! If the problem is too big, it'll be swept under the rug for fear of antagonizing Local 689."

Just want I like to see on a Wed- More grasshoppers feeding on the ant's fare card. Winter is coming :-(
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 698 weeks ago

Former union president. I have no interest in comments by formers, and the fact you are now displeased to need to find your marriage certificate is rather humerous to those of us who suffer Metro every day.

"A few instances of mistakenly..." Finish sentence your way - it all works. How pitiful is that?

And as I took the 2 minutes to write this comment I have now received 3 new Metro email alerts. They default into my spam folder. It makes me smile to see even my computer appears to not like Metro.
Think of the money wasted over the course of Metro's history. Think of the fare hikes you've had to endure to pay for these cretins to rip you off. Abhorrent!
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 698 weeks ago

"We have never before heard of any abuses of the Metro healthcare system by its employees. We are looking into it." -Metro Spokesperson
1 reply · active 698 weeks ago
Ever and Anon's avatar

Ever and Anon · 698 weeks ago

Maybe they should clean out their ears more often. ;)
Hats off to Unsuck for doing the reporting no one else does!
1 reply · active 698 weeks ago
You sure can't get it from Dr. Metro Kiss ass...
I'm shocked to learn that an employer that isn't aware of employees "borrowing" vehicles, laptops, and generators for years at a time would also have problems with health insurance fraud.
This may not be the proverbial straw the breaks the camel's back, but it is another straw. That back will break. WMATA and the ATU 689 can play the public for suckers for only so long. I just wonder how long until people start getting locked up. Let's start with Jeter.
UnSuck Fan's avatar

UnSuck Fan · 698 weeks ago

Meant to make a snotty comment a while ago, but.....

No wonder they refuse to cover Officer Ludwig's disability pay. They're too busy providing health coverage for everyone else who is somehow related to someone at WMATA!! @$$holes!!
They're in panic mode after the LIRR fraud: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/28/nyregion/charge...
Eh...while it should've been managed well from the start (I know I know...we're talking WMATA) so that problems didn't occur this isn't uncommon. My company (large Fortune 500 firm) did this last year to try and keep health expenses down. No one liked it but I'm sure they caught people abusing the system. I say good for metro if they're trying to fix the problem even if it never should've happened in the first place.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter