Monday, November 14, 2011

Union Work Rules Add to Overtime (Ab)Use


That Metro uses (some would say abuses) overtime (OT) is old news, but now that there's an official report, the Post is all over it.

A good chunk of the OT is the result of NTSB recommendations that Metro get the system fixed and Metro's subsequent scrambling to act after decades of being asleep at the wheel.

But a lot of the problems associated with heavy OT use, such as fatigue, could be avoided, Metro sources say.

According to them, there is tremendous waste.

A major source of waste?

Union work rules.

Remember how union work rules interfere with the efficient maintenance and upkeep of the escalators? Many of the same issues effect the amount of OT Metro "needs" to use to repair the rest of the system.

For example, if OT job X requires a team comprised of two workers proficient at task A, two workers proficient at task B and one proficient at task C, the union contract with Metro limits Metro's ability to ensure those workers with those skills actually arrive at the work location to do the job.

Seniority--nothing else--determines who shows up, say the three workers we talked to. The work that needs to be done is secondary, if it is considered at all.

It all adds up to delays and more OT.

"They just go from the [seniority] list when assigning work," said one Metro worker. "You're not getting the best or right people in the right situations to get the job done."

The source said it's not uncommon for workers to show up to a job location with people only proficient at one task--not necessarily the task that needs to get done.

"There's no continuity," they said. "At every OT job location you have different people, different skills."

Another worker added to that.

"A lot of the time, the OT is 'necessary' because the job didn't get done right the first time," they said.

They added that a lot of the time it's because people who don't know what to do because they are not qualified to do the work that needs to be done or don't speak English well enough to understand what needs to be done.

"The ones who know how to do the job end up doing it all while others stand around," the source said. "We don't have the time to teach them how to do it."

Lack of coordination by Metro is another reason there's so much OT.

Workers on an OT shift often show up at an OT work site not knowing what has been done before they get there. There's no systematic way of documentation, sources say.

"We spend a lot of time figuring out what has been done and what's left to do," said one source.

That's if they're actually able to work at all.

Sources said that often there are no tools or radios available, so they have to sit around and wait.

But there's another reason causing more sitting around, all the while collecting OT pay.

"There's no coordination between departments, so if the Track Department needs to get in to a work area, another team working on something else will get bumped and end up sitting around and do nothing."

It happens all the time said another source who said they'd actually worked about half the time during their last OT shift.

Will Metro change its use of OT?

Will the union protest management's "abuse" of workers?

What's the solution?
(from the Post article)

“It will require having more people on the payroll if you’re going to have less hours of work from people when they shouldn’t be working,” [Board member Mort] Downey said.

Where will the cash-strapped agency find the money for new hires?

“We’ll figure it out,” Downey said.

I'll give you one guess as to what that means.

There's more to the OT situation at Metro, including insight into both the union's and management's addiction to it. You can read about it in this excellent post by a retired Metro worker. Here's an excerpt:
...Sadly, many employees come to rely on OT just to pay their bills. OT in Automatic Train Control (ATC) has been somewhat cyclical over the years. When there wasn’t enough to go around (for some employees there’s never enough) people would start to squabble and fight over it. Some would go so far as to break into a field office and alter the OT ledger so that it would appear as though they hadn’t received as many assignments as their coworkers!
Other items:
Metro closing National Airport stop on weekend before Thanksgiving (WMATA)
Passenger shot on Metrobus (NBC4)

Comments (31)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Get ready for fare hikes. Metro is clearly in a transit death spiral. Higher fares, lower ridership, higher fares...
1 reply · active 697 weeks ago
unethical4's avatar

unethical4 · 697 weeks ago

You are exactly right anony... the Metro Board could have appealed the Unions appeal for the last contract but why would they? They are all in each other' s pockets so to speak.
If the Union President allows all the overtime to continue for her members then she is in the "good graces" of her members to re-elect her and her husband to top Union offices. (Jeter and Jeter, Husband and Wife 2 top Union offices)

Managers can stay in the Union and pay Union dues at Local 689. This is a conflict of Interest and should be abolished. (Look at the Last Local 689 Union Newsletter) [ Union Member and manager obituary .]

A few in congress who are also in the pockets of Unions will not mandate the overtime reduction unless we as taxpayers demand it in writing and VOTE them out!

Why is it the Fed Govt. gets comp time for overtime but metro employees have the right to ear more money? This is complicated but unfair to Federal workers who some would rather have the money!
How come the Post constantly enables Metro's call for more and more money. Why don't they try to dig a little deeper beyond the word's of a Board member?

WTF?!?!?
4 replies · active 697 weeks ago
anonymous's avatar

anonymous · 697 weeks ago

Why don't any outlets have any sources other than Metro itself? The Post quoted a station manager, and they are not even a concern of this report as they are not "safety critical" employees and don't get a lot of overtime.
I don't know why they don't have better sources, but each of the people I talked with is in a "safety critical" position and work a lot of OT.
Soundbyt2's avatar

Soundbyt2 · 697 weeks ago

Employees are not supposed to make comments to the media about information but I do think it is a good idea to allow employees to open up.
Maybe Unsuck could hold a forum for employees to speak out on internal issues which were covered up!
Because the Post if you did not know is = to metro and loves everything metro does until another media posts the truth.
There should have never been raises given to union employees when metro/the fed govt/and the state are in a budget crisis!
Why is there even a union in a publicly funded organization?
former employee's avatar

former employee · 697 weeks ago

Metro can not keep quailfied workers because of the OT. Most senior employees get appointed to "fill-in supervisors", fill-in lead men, or fill-in paper pusher" for years and lost or not up to date with skills needed to work in their classified field. Then you have the supervisors that are Union "Brothers" who take care of senior people. Senior people come in for OT to do their "appointed" job because they have no idea what to do--but they need thier high four. The less senior people who have knowledge often get kicked out of OT because of senority list. The list rotates every month so most senior employees are sure to get OT. This BS causes the qualified tech. to look for work somewhere else or not give a shit about their job. Disparate treatment??? It sure hell not "fair labor fair pay" Merit will never work in this Union so Metro will never work.
1 reply · active 697 weeks ago
Soundbyt2's avatar

Soundbyt2 · 697 weeks ago

that is right 'former employee'.
OT should be abolished at metro then watch how the mechanics, operators, and other misfits run to retire!
Then metro HR can start recruiting fairly by hiring all nationalities and Virginians to work at metro not just those who live in dc and md.
This post is right on. I can't tell you how many times I showed up to a work location with a bunch of numbut "higher ups" just looking for more OT. All their "skills" were gone, but they got put on the job.
Free money!!
1 reply · active 697 weeks ago
I know a bus mechanic who was told to "slow down" he was working too fast and making the other bus mechanics look bad. They told him to slow down on repairing the bus so they could do a job and take longer doing it for more money.
Metro needs to work with its union instead of everyone just blaming the union for everything that goes wrong. Metro workers deserve to earn a decent living just like everyone else. Just because Metro chose to bargain for benefits that have come back to bite them (yes Metro actually AGREED to these things during BARGAINING--it didn't HAVE to), people shouldn't jump on the union. Collective bargaining is a give and take process, and Metro could've sought another arrangement rather than the situation that currently exists.

Workers, including those in the public sector, have a right to seek decent wages and benefits for the work that they put in. Does it mean that crappy workers sometimes sneak through the system? Sure. But it doesn't mean that hard-working Metro employees should be denied the benefits that they deserve.
3 replies · active 697 weeks ago
Metro agreed to this, you're right. But does that mean the union has the right to bleed it's customers for even more money?
Of course not. Unions are not perfect institutions and they advocate for their members, not the collective good. A PP said that management are union members, which is generally uncommon for supervisors of union employees. That could be one of the reasons why Metro workers are taking advantage of the contract. It sounds like Metro has not done a great job of negotiating the contract (which interferes with the balance and gives the union undue power) or enforcing the contract. Unions are not perfect, but I guarantee the contract doesn't say employees are allowed to sit on their butts all day not working or ignoring customers or anything like that. Not all unions are big, evil institutions and not all union employees are as lazy as many Metro employees.
former employee's avatar

former employee · 697 weeks ago

689 is a disgrace to all Labor Unions. It takes 3 years for unfair treatment grieveance to be heard because Union wanted the"fired" disciplinary employees to have their grievance heard first. What about Supervisor who are 689 union members? Confilict of interest?? One thing that this union has that Metro does'nt is smart labor lawyers.
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 697 weeks ago

Some days I feel like I'd be safer walking across the 14th St. Bridge than taking Metro.
1 reply · active 697 weeks ago
Soundbyt2's avatar

Soundbyt2 · 697 weeks ago

Their salaries are bloated and not realistic to the times.
There are workers who do the same job and receive fair wages!
UnSuck Fan's avatar

UnSuck Fan · 697 weeks ago

No, what WMATA and The Post don't say (that UnSuck already reported on earlier this year) is that the REAL reason why it takes so many people to get a freakin' job done is because of the rampant cheating on those tests. Everyone wants a promotion and more money without actually knowing HOW to do the required work and actually DOING said work. And once the people who actually know how to do their job and actually do said work, retire, we the riders will get screwed yet again!!

For those of you who can abandon WMATA (unfortunately, I can't) and find another way to get to and from work, I hope you'll considerate it and think of those who can't and are trapped!
Thanks, Unsuck, for giving us news about what's really going on at Metro and not just lame excuses about why they need to raise fares again.

I'd be all for giving Metro as much money as it needed to provide the DC area with good public transport, but right now, it would seem they flush a lot of money down the toilet.
1 reply · active 697 weeks ago
If I rode Metro rail I would demand part of my fare refunded every time I was late to work, my train broke down, I had to get off a train for problem/issue, I had to get off the train and take a bus to get to work. When riders begin to request their money back in large numbers, keep records and file a consumers affairs complaint for a refunds. Managers will never change they way they do things.
#1 They think they way things go are 'just fine'.
#2 They don't know any other fundamental ways to do things differently.
#3 Why should they? [No oversight to force them to change]
Unsuck has reported on many topics which are real 'eyeopeners'. But he has yet to report the abuse of one sector women workers who are bullied, abused, name called, urinated in front of, slandered and demeaned.

This subject matter is hidden from the public just like the child abuse in state funded Universities.

There is and should be no room for abuse in the workplace and it should be public information and if not now soon!
LoxyBrown's avatar

LoxyBrown · 697 weeks ago

The paragraph written prior to your excerpt: 'Metro would have the public believe that the union — ATU Local 689 — controls the amount of OT when of course it’s management that determines staffing requirements and has the ability to hire additional employees to reduce OT if they really want to.'

If mgmt fosters an environment of mistrust & selling out their employees (who depend on OT to cover their bills--most 'overpaid' employees I know aren't working OT), they shouldn't be surprised when that same sentiment comes back to bite them in the ass. As usual, the people with the big money (the higher ups) have the clout & power to sell the public whatever opinion of workers they'd like us to have. Of course there are horrible employees that shouldn't be responsible for people's safety.
LoxyBrown's avatar

LoxyBrown · 697 weeks ago

(cont'd)
Do I think the spotlight being shone on employees with a crap work ethic makes the entire org look bad? Yes. Should that represent every employee that works there? No. Does every workplace have its share of lazy, dishonest sleaze? Sure.

All that said, I don't believe us Metro riders (believe you me, I'm as frustrated as the rest of you when trudging up a busted escalator) will see the benefits better workers by lowering the current wage to below livable. The image of WMATA needs a top-down facelift.

The public really wants to respect you, Metro. Earn it.
pro union's avatar

pro union · 697 weeks ago

If Metro workers are being abused, where is Ms. Jeter?

She's sitting back with her hubby counting 6 figures that come from the MANDATORY (you do realize that you HAVE to be in the union if you work at metro) dues of her union members who don't care as much since they're pulling in the OT.

Jeter and Metro are in bed together on this one.
danstiller's avatar

danstiller · 697 weeks ago

This is a problem for years. The real abuser is the top managers. They allow it to happen. Don't forget, they approved the overtime.

The solution: tell the top managers pick up their tool boxes and go to work, instead talking nonsense.
1 reply · active 697 weeks ago
former employee's avatar

former employee · 697 weeks ago

Or tell the workers who are getting AA pay for pushing paper to bring his tool box back that he took home when the Supt. appointed him/her to work outside their classification. I know many AA have been doing this for years. Union position "past practice" Most of older workers feel they earn their time "get the young ones to do the job" Not all THere are many good high senority employees who are go getters and have work ethics.
Why isn't the OT ledger information linked to or verified against the actual OT worked and paid?
Reading this, it's amazing that anything works on Metro ever! What a backwards organization.
Post article: "Unlike federal regulations that limit the hours a truck driver, railroad engineer or pilot can operate a vehicle, train or plane, there are no federal rules limiting the number of hours transit employees can work."

Clearly, since neither Metro or the union is working to prevent worker fatigue, there is a need for federal regulation of train operator hours.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter