
A former Metro operator wrote in with a grateful note for bringing the toilet issue to light. According to them, there's hostility directed at operators who ask for "personal" breaks, which might include going to the bathroom.
Sometimes, Central Control tries to intimidate operators by asking their name over the [radio] when they call for a bathroom break on the train. This may be recorded to see if you continually ask for a personal break. One operator I knew asked for a personal break daily because he took medication.But according to one purported Metro insider, it's not always a lack of time that leads to tunnel abuse. The below is from the blog washington-dc-metro.com, allegedly written by a retired Metro worker with 27 years experience. Warning: It's not good mealtime reading.
This is an intimidation method to deter train operators from asking for personal bathroom breaks.
Case in point – after years of effort we were finally able to convince management to install an incinerating toilet within about 150 feet of where the inbound end of a train in the pocket track would be. It can be seen from the platform end gate (outbound end, outbound track). Some operators still used the pocket track as their personal toilet. I got so disgusted that I used some fluorescent orange spray paint to write “Bathroom – 150 Feet >” on the tunnel wall. My “sign” was removed but the problem continued.Other items:
I even considered buying one or two of those fake surveillance cameras and installing them in the pocket but never did.
At one point, after we had complained to the superintendent of A99 about the unsanitary working conditions, my coworkers found some newspaper stuffed into one of the “block boxes” at A11. [A block box is a red steel box with a Plexiglass front that is used to store equipment to mechanically operate and lock track switches in the event of a failure – so that trains can continue to move safely until ATC is given permission to work on them]. The ATC techs assumed that someone had just stuffed the newspaper in there to prevent it from blowing around and had meant to return and remove it. It turned out that a disgruntled operator had defecated near our switches, wiped his/her ass with the newspaper, and then stuffed it into the block box for my coworkers to find – and unknowingly remove with their bare hands.
Yep, that’s the union brotherhood/sisterhood you hear so much about.
January night maintenance schedule (WMATA)
January weekend maintenance schedule (WMATA)
Man indicted in Metro bomb plot (WaPo)
Anon · 742 weeks ago
Anon · 741 weeks ago
get1real · 692 weeks ago
I bet Jeter has a bathroom she uses in the union hall whenever she has the urge!
Anonymous · 742 weeks ago
I would think the operator could have a supervisor help in this matter.
For example the operator in the pocket track would call OCC for a bathroom break. He would pull the train on the platform.
The supervisor would pull the train in the pocket track.
The supervisor with permission would then retrieve the operator and the operator would pull back into the pocket track.
This is a safer maneuver but it would take too much time and effort,
The next option is let the operator go to the bathroom while on the platform station bathroom before pulling into the pocket track.
What is the longest length of time an operator is in the pocket track?
Matt G · 742 weeks ago
What they could do is this - switch operators before it enters the pocket track, and give the off-going operator 8 minutes or something, then come back down and act as the relief for the next off-going operator. That way, everyone gets a poop break and service isn't interrupted. In essence, with the cascading effect, one, maybe two more operators would be inserted in to the rotation - and the extra time could be made up elsewhere. Does that make sense?
bet · 742 weeks ago
anon · 692 weeks ago
Radner · 742 weeks ago
hrh king friday 13 · 742 weeks ago
I haven no doubt there are abuses in the bathroom break system. Metro managers should be recording which operators are going on bathroom breaks (hell, I wish they would take safety/maintenance checks as seriously). Perhaps if WMATA could actually FIRE those abusing the break system, they wouldn't have to unfairly penalize the good employees.
I do sympathize with your first anon source. He's probably one of the good ones. To him I say: union members-- the small subset of those of you who are responsible professionals-- take back your union. Weed out the lazy asses in your ranks and you wouldn't have these kinds of so-called "intimidation issues. Start with Jeter.
dcgirl · 742 weeks ago
@VeggieTart · 742 weeks ago
anon · 742 weeks ago
I guess she has a bathroom at the Union down the hall. Maybe where she worked at Metro she had access to bathroom in her interlocking room.
Just ignore these attempts Jeter and continue to go on your trips, vacations and campaigns. I believe this is it for you and your husband as elected union reps.
bet · 692 weeks ago
fyi · 742 weeks ago
I wonder if the Board of Supervisors in Fairfax who are on the Metro board ever ride the Metro buses in Virginia and observe these actions or even ride trains.
I have witnessed bus drivers recently using blue-tooth headsets while driving buses.
ThatisNotMyBag · 742 weeks ago
guest · 742 weeks ago
M-Z · 741 weeks ago
retiree · 741 weeks ago
Sometimes OCC would get po'd, but so what? Mostly, they got mad at operators who took advantage, and would get a relief, then not come back. (yeah, some jerks did this.)