Monday, January 31, 2011

Should they be More Candid?


A Wee-Z bond similar to those used by WMATA. This is from the Charlotte North Carolina CATS Lynx Light Rail

On Jan. 22, Orange and Blue line trains were single tracking through the Rosslyn tunnel for pretty much the entire day because of "unscheduled track maintenance." That was the only description we could find from Metro at the time of the event.

A source inside Metro revealed a few more details.

Basically, a piece of track equipment--a diesel mover--got caught up in some other equipment, and that equipment was dragged and knocked through the tunnel destroying or badly damaging 11 track circuits along track 1, they said.

Track circuits, also known as Wee-Z bonds, are vital pieces of equipment that, for one thing, convey information about the whereabouts of trains along the tracks.

After wreaking havoc in the tunnel, the diesel mover eventually derailed, they said. No one was injured.

According to the source, the incident led to "a lot of work and territory to cover."

How was something causing this amount of damage allowed to go on for as long as it did?

The source did not know, but said it's likely that in Metro's Central Control, where trains are monitored and guided, someone "should have seen a row of indications on their main display telling them that track circuits were showing occupancies and staying occupied."

That apparently did not happen.

Over 24 hours, an internal email said, Metro track crews scurried to fix the damage, which was characterized as an "emergency." According to the source, lots of overtime was racked up as well.

Unsuck asked Metro about the incident, and after several days of prodding, this is what they said:
"A track buggy that was being used to transport rail parts to various locations Friday night was returning to the yard when it derailed early Saturday. There were no injuries. We single-tracked Blue and Orange Line trains while we removed the vehicle and made some track repairs. The equipment will undergo a complete inspection before it is returned to service."
When now permanent GM Sarles was appointed interim GM, he said "I don't want to hide problems. That's the worst thing you can do."

Do you think Metro should have been a little more forthright with the public about what appears to have been a costly breakdown of Metro's "culture of safety?"

Other items:
Goodbye paper transfers passes (WaPo)

Comments (32)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Its' Kubicek and his people that is the source of this secrecy.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Truth!
This is the new culture that Sarles has created? Can we fire the Board and just have the feds take over already please?
5 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
I wonder what the pay and bonus would be if the Board hired someone who acturally was qualified to performed GM duties. Wow!!! And who does Kubicek know to keep his job?
Guest , I asked the same question.
He's in the progression "buddy" system with the other Bus Mechanics who want to move up. Didn't you know?
The grass is always greener on the other side. If the Feds ran WMATA, people would be complaining that the government is too large, blah blah blah, and there would be calls to de-federalize.
Maybe they'd want to privatize it, but what kind of nutjob would suggest turning it over to an entirely unaccountable quasi-governmental organization?
At least no iPads were damaged!
I'm getting to the point that I think I'd rather not know. I see the tourists riding along so happily, and completely unaware of their impending doom. If ignorance really is bliss, perhaps I'll choose bliss.
We're talking hundreds of feet if not yards of damage
Under "other items," that probably should say "Goodbye paper passes" and not "transfers"--they disappeared long ago.
1 reply · active 738 weeks ago
More of the same from Metro. Typical. What used to be a good system when I was a kid is now a dangerous, terrible ride and the people who run it are lying idiots. I weep for the future.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Metro is the same as it's always been. When we were kids and when there was little or no Internet, we were simply ignorant to the way things operated. Now, in the age of blogs and transparency, we see what goes on. But it's always been the same.
Metro will only announce and f-up if someone is killed. Not killing is considered a success at metro, so what's to announce?
"Cover ups" are a Standard Operating Procedure for this transportation system. If you lie and cover up, twist the truth at metro you can be promoted and voted into or appointed to the "buddy" group.

When the press gets a hold of the "truth" as you see above statement, very limited information is released and no one gets disciplines/fired in the "buddy" group.

Sad to say that nothing will change with this ceo promoting the same culture of hiding the truth and not firing or removing his supervisors and appointed managers.

When you have managers who are uneducated, unskilled, inexperienced or a safety risk you have the nightmares and huge costs (wasted tax dollars) which have presented themselves.

This company seems to just put out the fires, mistakes when they happen then try to cover it up when it becomes public information.
anonymous user's avatar

anonymous user · 738 weeks ago

It turns my stomach to have to hand over money to these people every day.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
So stop doing it. What's stopping you from driving or biking?
I guess I'm confused as to which part of this situation you're taking issue with. Is it the fact that a detailed explanation of the damages wasn't announced immediately and it was limited to "emergency track repair" or whatever explanation was given? Or is it the fact that it took a direct question and several follow-ups to get an answer?

Because I feel like when the situation is developing, there's nothing wrong with giving an explanation limited to "emergency track work -- single tracking" or something to that effect. I think the people that read this blog are interested in what happened, but for the vast majority of the riding public, they neither feel the need to know what happened, nor do they care. They only care that they're single-tracked and it will take longer.

If the problem is with the amount of time it took to get a response from Metro following a direct question, I think that makes more sense. I also think that if more comes out about this, then we have every right to know about it, like someone who fell asleep at the control board and didn't notice the indicator lights staying on. But I don't expect that to happen, because in general Metro prefers to cover things up until someone breaks the story.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
DailyRider's avatar

DailyRider · 738 weeks ago

Let's see, a diesel mover, or track buggy, struck and drug other equipment far enough to tear up eleven track circuits. All the public was ever told was single tracking due to emergency maintenance.

If you don't see a problem here, I don't know what could be said to convince you there is one.
GlenmontGirl's avatar

GlenmontGirl · 738 weeks ago

I would tend to agree with you. However, I think part of the problem is that the initial explanation was "unscheduled track maintenance". I think it might have been better if Metro had called it what it was, "emergency track repair", as you mentioned above.

I also think that after the situation was contained, Metro should have provided a more detailed explanation to the public. That they didn't seems to suggest a cover-up to a lot of people.
There are so many incidents where someone was negligent and caused damage or took lives.

Talking on cell phones, not repairing what was reported and the failure was a cause of injury, employees not following established rules, then because you family works at Metro, you never get a "slap on the wrists".

When internal employees do their job and report safety risks they are labeled "troublemakers".

I remember when a tool box was left on the rail way side and the train went by and drug it hundreds of feet and you can imagine what that tool box tore up.
You people do not need to know what the problems are metro just needs to make the repairs. IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, DO YOU REPORT TO EVERYBODY ABOUT YOUR PROBLEMS.

SO MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. GET A LIFE
3 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
you pay for the train ride not to know what goes wrong at metro. Like I said before you run your pie hole about everything on this site, you think you know everything you unbelievable moron.

GET A LIFE
I know I shouldn't feed a troll, but...

Even if you think that we are paying for the train ride, our governments are paying for the maintenance. As taxpayers who thus pay for the maintenance, we should know when actions happen that (1) will cost even more money to fix and (2) reflect on the Metro culture.
Clowns. This is typical. If you only know the real extent of what goes on at the authority....
no one- you are correct it is "outrageous" what goes on and the ntsb, dot or toc have not looked into all the bs.
I pay a huge amount of taxes every year and I am sick and tired of it being wasted, abused, and used on legal fees to defend "derelicts" who are not safe nor qualified!
Doesn't the Rosslyn tunnel just have a single track?

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter