A Wee-Z bond similar to those used by WMATA. This is from the Charlotte North Carolina CATS Lynx Light Rail
On Jan. 22, Orange and Blue line trains were single tracking through the Rosslyn tunnel for pretty much the entire day because of "unscheduled track maintenance." That was the only description we could find from Metro at the time of the event.
A source inside Metro revealed a few more details.
Basically, a piece of track equipment--a diesel mover--got caught up in some other equipment, and that equipment was dragged and knocked through the tunnel destroying or badly damaging 11 track circuits along track 1, they said.
Track circuits, also known as Wee-Z bonds, are vital pieces of equipment that, for one thing, convey information about the whereabouts of trains along the tracks.
After wreaking havoc in the tunnel, the diesel mover eventually derailed, they said. No one was injured.
According to the source, the incident led to "a lot of work and territory to cover."
How was something causing this amount of damage allowed to go on for as long as it did?
The source did not know, but said it's likely that in Metro's Central Control, where trains are monitored and guided, someone "should have seen a row of indications on their main display telling them that track circuits were showing occupancies and staying occupied."
That apparently did not happen.
Over 24 hours, an internal email said, Metro track crews scurried to fix the damage, which was characterized as an "emergency." According to the source, lots of overtime was racked up as well.
Unsuck asked Metro about the incident, and after several days of prodding, this is what they said:
"A track buggy that was being used to transport rail parts to various locations Friday night was returning to the yard when it derailed early Saturday. There were no injuries. We single-tracked Blue and Orange Line trains while we removed the vehicle and made some track repairs. The equipment will undergo a complete inspection before it is returned to service."When now permanent GM Sarles was appointed interim GM, he said "I don't want to hide problems. That's the worst thing you can do."
Do you think Metro should have been a little more forthright with the public about what appears to have been a costly breakdown of Metro's "culture of safety?"
Other items:
Goodbye paper
Metroguy · 738 weeks ago
Truth · 738 weeks ago
F'n JD · 738 weeks ago
Guest · 738 weeks ago
anon · 738 weeks ago
anon · 738 weeks ago
Sam · 738 weeks ago
Ummm · 738 weeks ago
@kara_h · 738 weeks ago
Scott · 738 weeks ago
Radner · 738 weeks ago
tracker · 738 weeks ago
jkuchen · 738 weeks ago
unsuckdcmetro 92p · 738 weeks ago
Sad Ness · 738 weeks ago
Sam · 738 weeks ago
· 738 weeks ago
bet · 738 weeks ago
When the press gets a hold of the "truth" as you see above statement, very limited information is released and no one gets disciplines/fired in the "buddy" group.
Sad to say that nothing will change with this ceo promoting the same culture of hiding the truth and not firing or removing his supervisors and appointed managers.
When you have managers who are uneducated, unskilled, inexperienced or a safety risk you have the nightmares and huge costs (wasted tax dollars) which have presented themselves.
This company seems to just put out the fires, mistakes when they happen then try to cover it up when it becomes public information.
anonymous user · 738 weeks ago
James · 738 weeks ago
Meredith · 738 weeks ago
Because I feel like when the situation is developing, there's nothing wrong with giving an explanation limited to "emergency track work -- single tracking" or something to that effect. I think the people that read this blog are interested in what happened, but for the vast majority of the riding public, they neither feel the need to know what happened, nor do they care. They only care that they're single-tracked and it will take longer.
If the problem is with the amount of time it took to get a response from Metro following a direct question, I think that makes more sense. I also think that if more comes out about this, then we have every right to know about it, like someone who fell asleep at the control board and didn't notice the indicator lights staying on. But I don't expect that to happen, because in general Metro prefers to cover things up until someone breaks the story.
DailyRider · 738 weeks ago
If you don't see a problem here, I don't know what could be said to convince you there is one.
GlenmontGirl · 738 weeks ago
I also think that after the situation was contained, Metro should have provided a more detailed explanation to the public. That they didn't seems to suggest a cover-up to a lot of people.
bet · 738 weeks ago
Talking on cell phones, not repairing what was reported and the failure was a cause of injury, employees not following established rules, then because you family works at Metro, you never get a "slap on the wrists".
When internal employees do their job and report safety risks they are labeled "troublemakers".
I remember when a tool box was left on the rail way side and the train went by and drug it hundreds of feet and you can imagine what that tool box tore up.
anon · 738 weeks ago
SO MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. GET A LIFE
@kara_h · 738 weeks ago
I do not know about in your job, but most places if a paying customer (whether or not they were in any danger) asks a question about something that affects/concerns them they get an answer and the employee is ethically bound to do so. The immediate answer may be to bump it up the chain because the employee does not have the authority to speak for the company, but to not do so is the definition of covering something up.
Say you go out to lunch. you take a bite and it tastes REALLY bad .... not at all like it should. It does not take a brain surgeon to figure out that something in there has gone off. By your logic you should not ask about it, right? I am curious btw, how would you feel if the next person to order that dies of food poisoning?
anon · 738 weeks ago
GET A LIFE
jkuchen · 738 weeks ago
Even if you think that we are paying for the train ride, our governments are paying for the maintenance. As taxpayers who thus pay for the maintenance, we should know when actions happen that (1) will cost even more money to fix and (2) reflect on the Metro culture.
no one · 738 weeks ago
bet · 738 weeks ago
Anon · 738 weeks ago
Adam L · 738 weeks ago