Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Trapped in Twinbrook


From Dave:
On the afternoon of Dec. 27, I got to my car at the Twinbrook parking lot in Rockville at 6:13 p.m. I know this because I called my wife, telling her I could stop at the store to pick up dinner. I didn't exit the parking lot until 7:01. Why? Because I was held hostage by Metro.

When I pulled out of my space, I drove toward the exit and immediately knew something was wrong. There was a line of 20 cars in front of me, none of them able to exit.

I immediately knew what was wrong.

The SmarTrip reader wasn't working.

I know this because the same problem happened a few months ago, only this time it was worse.

When the SmarTrip reader isn't working, Metro doesn't just open the gate and let you out.

Instead, they make EACH car fill out a form stating that you're unable to pay prior to exiting. This form is meant to be used when someone doesn't have the money or SmarTrip balance to exit a lot.

This allows the parking attendant to take down the drivers information, and lets the attendant open the gate.

It should not and is not intended to be used when Metro's machines are malfunctioning and can't read a SmarTrip card.

The form is long, cumbersome, and takes several minutes to complete. When 50-plus people are trying to exit a parking lot, you can immediately see the chaos that would result if each of those cars had to fill out this form before leaving.


How can Metro justify keeping each car in their parking lot for that long?

Why should the riders be held hostage for so long because of a malfunction of Metro's machines?

I had money on my card to exit. I even told the attendant I could pay in cash.

It didn't matter.

He refused to let us go until I filled out the form.

I asked him what he would do if there was an emergency. He didn't seem to care. He said I should call the police and maybe they'd let everyone leave. But his supervisor wouldn't authorize him to raise the gate.

To make matters worse, the second gate to exit was blocked by the parking attendant's car.

When this happened a few months ago, no car was parked in the other exit lane. When another customer asked what would happen if he just drove out, the parking attendant said "nothing," so he did just that. Seconds later, the other 20-plus cars did the same.

This time, that wasn't possible.

I called Metro's customer service number to try to see if they could do something. I spoke to a representative, and he seemed helpful--at first.

He took down the information I provided about the situation and contacted his supervisor.

What did his supervisor suggest?

He said they'd send another parking attendant out to take down the information so they could speed up the process!

Unacceptable!

When I asked what else could be done, he told me nothing.

He didn't care about what I and many others were going through. He wouldn't let me speak to his supervisor. When I told him that this is why the agency he works for is failing, he couldn't have cared less.

By this point, I had been waiting for about 30 minutes. Everyone waiting was honking their horns as if their life depended on it. People were getting out of their cars yelling.

I seriously thought a mob might form.

If I had been driving an SUV, I would have driven around the gate, but unfortunately my sedan didn't seem like it could make it, especially with all of the mud around from the rain all day.

By this point I was so frustrated I called the Rockville police's non-emergency number. They were helpful and sympathetic, but had to transfer me to Metro Transit Police, since it was their jurisdiction.

When I spoke to Metro Transit Police, they said they'd send someone over. Whether or not they ever made it, I don't know.

I finally exited the lot at 7:01. When the parking attendant asked me to fill out the unable to pay form, I wrote a few choice words on it, and he opened the gate, and I left.

I was finally free after being held hostage in Metro's parking lot like a caged animal because their machines were malfunctioning.

I've been riding Metro for almost eight years. I've experienced a lot of horrible things done by Metro during that time, but this takes the cake. This is an all-time low, even for Metro.

The parking attendant supervisor who wouldn't authorize the gate to be lifted should be fired, Metro should issue an apology to each person impacted by this incident, and each rider should be able to park for free for a year as a result of this inexcusable action.

This is just further proof that Metro doesn't care about their riders, the customers that pay for the agency to exist.

This might be my breaking point when it comes to Metro. In 2012, I might be exploring other ways to get into downtown DC each day.

At least when you're stuck in traffic driving, you made that decision, where as with Metro they make the decision for you.
Other items:
Dude, where's my SmarTrip balance? (Examiner)

Comments (51)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Ok, Metro screwed up big time. BUT..."He didn't care about what I and many others were going through."

Wow, sitting in your car for an hour. Inconvenient? Yes. Worthy of this whiny rant? Hardly.
22 replies · active 413 weeks ago
Um what if there had been a family emergency? What if someone in one of the cars were sick?

Don't cut Metro slack. They live on the slack and indifference given by people like you.
Then that is something to go ballistic on, but because he had to sit in his car, not a big story.

Certainly not enough to say "He didn't care what I and many others were going through" as if it were the Bataan Death March.
Doesn't even need to be a family emergency or a sick passenger. What about a kid who needs to be picked up from daycare, resulting in the family being charged extra? Needing to pick someone up from the airport? Getting dinner on the table at a reasonable hour?

I'd be royally pi$$ed if I were detained for the better part of an hour because Metro (again) doesn't have its [stuff] together. Totally agree that they deserve no slack for this incident.
Ok, his wife is at home. If the kids need picked up he could use his cell phone and say "Metro is lousy. Can you get the kids?"
No, just because Metro held him up doesn't make him an unloving husband. I think the reaction is a bit much. What we're all going through. Melodramatic. I think it would be taken more serious by people if it wasn't whiny and entitled. It sucks, but it isn't like it was a major problem. It isn't like the brakes fell off and it took two hours to evacuate.
Really??? What if they don't have a second car? What if his wife was busy taking care of another family member? What if she was working on a deadline for work? Or any multitude of reasons? Please stop making excuses for metro's utter lack of ability to function as a transit service.
If it were me (and probably a bunch of other folks in the same line as the OP), there is no one else to pick up my kid from daycare. I doubt my spouse will be making it back from Afghanistan to do it for me. Being that late could easily result in getting kicked out of daycare. If you've ever tried to get into good daycare here, you'd know that's not something parents take lightly.
xmetro rider's avatar

xmetro rider · 690 weeks ago

Users pay to park, not sit in their cars for an hour because metro's smartrip isn't working. An hour might be a minor inconvenience to you, but to many others it is not. I once was delayed due to "smoke in a tunnel" and my wife could not make it to a tutoring session, that delay cost my family $180. The point is it doesn't matter what the result of metro's incompetence is, what matters is that metro routinely and systematically handles adversity badly. I suspect there are a great number of incompetent people in charge of decisions, probably due to promoting from within.
I hope next time you're trying to exit a metro parking lot the machines don't work and get stuck and you have diarrhea. Karma FTW biatch.
Joke is on you. I don't use Metro anymore. Haven't for almost two years.
Hey, that's my handle!
Question for everyone (Maybe Unsuck can help on this)
What is the record for the most negative post? Because I think Todd is going for the gold on this one...
I think one was voted down over 100 once, so the record is safe. Can't remember the post, however.
Wow that post must have been something then!
Todd should rename himself to unsuck unsuckdcmetro.
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 690 weeks ago

I can see the Venn diagram now: the larger circles would be incompetence, indifference, and mismanagement. The area overlapped by all three? Label that one "Metro".
It's not the guy's problem that he is ready and willing to pay - in two forms, both smarttrip and cash - but metro can't handle it and has to hold everyone in.

What if this was Shady Grove?
1 reply · active 690 weeks ago
they'd still be there. :)
DCDriver's avatar

DCDriver · 690 weeks ago

To the OP: I had my breaking point with Metro about a year and a half ago and started exploring other methods of getting to work. I found a parking garage close to my office where I pay $225 each month. Metro was costing me $300 each month with fares and parking, so I just stopped using it. I already had to drive to the metro and park anyway...so now I just drive a little bit further and save myself from the daily roll of the dice as to whether or not Metro is going to put me over a barrel every day.
1 reply · active 690 weeks ago
I have a parking lot right next to Metro for $50 a month. Saved me about $40 a month.
To the OP: I had my breaking point with Metro about a year and a half ago and started exploring other methods of getting to work. I found a parking garage close to my office where I pay $225 each month. Metro was costing me $300 each month with fares and parking
It wasn't just a thirty minute wait for the drivers -- it was a thirty minute wait on top of however long it took them to get to Twinbrook by train. But more importantly, no one present at that parking lot had any legal authority to detain drivers in the absence of a safety problem or criminal activity.
I haven't used metro lots in a while and currently don't live in the area but why do you need to swipe your card to get out of the lot period? When you swipe it to get in isn't that when you are charged? Unless something has changed, they don't charge you by the amount of time you are parked just for parking correct? Why would you have to swipe again to get out instead of there being an automatic exit mechanism and if that breaks the attendant can simply raise the gate?

When I parked daily at Ft Totten from 2003-2007 I had to swipe to enter and the gates were open when I left the lot around 5:30pm, has the system changed that much? I recall people parking at the meters to run in and put money on their cards so they could get into the lot because it wouldn't let you in if you didn't have sufficient funds.
6 replies · active 690 weeks ago
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 690 weeks ago

These days you enter without swiping- gate arms are just raised.

To exit, you swipe and wait for the gate arm to raise.
Most, if not all, Metro lots charge you when you leave. There are some whose gates are closed in the mornings, but they automatically open when the car approaches.
Thanks for the reply. Anyone know why the old (IMO better) way was changed? It seems to me that if you pay first you avoid issues like this. If the smart trip scanner is broken on your way in you have the option of driving elsewhere to find parking in lieu of being trapped for an hour.
It varied from station to station, I think. For example, for Wheaton you had to trigger the gate to open, rather than it already being open, whereas in other stations the gate was already up. I'm not sure about having to pay ahead of time, though - that I don't recall now. But back in the day, you didn't get charged if you left after a certain hour (I think 10 pm), so for those you were paying on exit, not entry. They got rid of that rule to increase revenue.
possibly to avoid problems if you card into the lot and then can't find a space? i think that's why they leave the gates up 'til ten--too many people were entering the lots and discovering they couldn't park, then being charged on exit.
Not sure how it was at other lots but @ Ft. Totten if the lot was full the gates were blocked and you were denied entrance by the attendant

Back before the massive theft by Metro Parking attendants was exposed you always paid when entering with cash. I recall reading the smart trip only policy was put in place to prevent the further looting of I believe millions by attendants.
oh man, my sympathies. i saw you guys in line and wondered WTH was going on. (i've had my own issues with that parking gate.)

my suggestion: park in the alaire parking garage next door. $4 if you're in by 10 am. (--which is not to say atlantic parking doesn't have its own issues, but the times there have been problems getting out of that garage there's either a parking guy in the office, or you go to the concierge desk in the condo and it's taken care of. no sitting in line for an hour.)
FWIW, I have used the Fairfax connector buses in the past and if ever there was an issue with the fare machine on the bus we would all get a free ride. Just saying.......
1 reply · active 690 weeks ago
Before FC took over the Centreville lines, I lost count of the number of times we got a free ride because the fare machine wasn't working. Think of the money they lost on those rides that evidently they were content to lose and compare it to the hassle of that parking lot. I know, it would take 3x the number of riders to equal the number of cars, but I just know that it happened a lot with Metrobus.
OP- Consider a class action suit for false imprisonment. When a merchant detains for an unreasonable period of time, that large of a number of people, it surely falls outside the "merchants exception" rule to the tort of false imprisonment.

At the very least a competent attorney would negotiate a settlement with Metro that resulted in WMATA being forced to change whatever policy caused this disaster.
3 replies · active 690 weeks ago
DC Denizen's avatar

DC Denizen · 690 weeks ago

Maybe the next time this happens, someone should call in and report a hostage situation to Metro Transit Police?
Good idea but metro would just pull the soverein immunity defense again.

They REALLY need to take that away from them as they use it way beyond the intent.
Honestly, I am kind of thankful they have sovereign immunity. Yes, I wish I could sue them, but then everyone would. I already pay ten dollars plus round trip. I can't really afford 50 dollars round trip.
This happened to me at the Grosvenor parking lot about 4 years ago. When the gate stopped working I was about 3rd in line. I waited patiently for 10 minutes then got out of my car and broke down the gate. Sorry, Metro. I'm not waiting for you to figure it out.
When the parking lot exit is broken they need to put the arm up and just let people leave, they will not get the money but making people go though that was just wrong. They need to fix the problem.

So glad I don't use Metro to get to work now.
What Is False Imprisonment:

In most states, false imprisonment is defined as the confinement of a person without legal authority or the person's consent. Generally, false imprisonment is accomplished by force or threat of force, and any consent obtained by coercion or threat is not considered valid. False imprisonment is often a misdemeanor and may also be the basis for a civil suit for damages.

If someone wrongfully prevents someone else from leaving a room, a vehicle, or a building when that person wants to leave, this is false imprisonment. This can apply to family members if the person desiring to leave is an adult. Years ago when "deprogramming" was in style, several parents and family members were prosecuted for false imprisonment for confining adult children. Spouses have no legal right to confine each other either.
I had another awful experience in the Twinbrook lot a few weeks earlier, when I left my Smartcard at work. As regular Twinbrook riders may know, the Smartcard machine has been out forever. Nice move, Metro, require us to have to cards but not allow us to buy them. Anyway, I was told I could just show my farecard with $4.75 on it to the attendant. Problem: no attendant at gate. Back to station. Officer there calls attendant, says he'll be at gate in ten minutes. I give him fifteen. Back to gate. Nobody there. Did I mention it was windy and rainy as hell?
Finally the guy shows up. Turns out he was manning BOTH gates, on east and west sides of Twinbrook station. Guess that's how you keep salaries low, Metro? I was extremely ticked off and demanded he lift the gate w/o my paying. He refused and was mad at ME for complaining. I ended up paying. I was so angry.
Metro just sucks. It is the most miserable system, and the only reason I stay with it is 1) I am subsidized (bribed, actually) through Smartbenefits and 2) the traffic really is that bad.
Also just wanted to say I was in that line of cars OP writes about, and could not for the life of me understand why they didn't just lift the stupid gate and let everyone out, forget about the money. God forbid Metro lose some revenue! Like those lovely delays that make you an hour late to your office but you're still required to pony up the $4+ for the privilege.

I say it to myself repeatedly, if I did my job like Metro does theirs I would be so fired, and I would totally deserve it.
One more comment (sorry, can't leave this alone) - Metro was extremely lucky the night described by the OP. Because it was during the week between Christmas and New Year's, the lot was only about half full. Had it not been for the holidays, there would have been several DOZEN cars in line waiting for Metro staff to enable our departure.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter