
COMMENTS ARE CLOSED
From Anonymous:
On Thursday at 12:30 p.m., I was riding the Red Line in the direction of Shady Grove. At Union Station, a group of six teenagers got onto my car with notebooks they were using to scam people. The kids use fraudulent Boys and Girls Club donation information to steal money.Other items:
They started their rounds – working their way from the back of the car to the front of the car, where I was sitting with my headphones on and staring out the window.
The first boy approached me and started his spiel, to which I said “No, thanks,” and he left without incident. A second boy approached me, began his spiel, and once again left without incident.
The third boy who approached me didn’t speak to me at first. He stood leaning against my seat, mumbling under his breath. I heard, over my music, “You need to wipe that stupid f***ing smirk off your face.”
Since I had not been doing anything to antagonize these kids and was minding my own business listening to music, I thought maybe I misheard him and took my headphones off. “Excuse me?” I asked. He repeated, angrily, “I don’t like that stupid f***ing smirk you have on your face.”
I replied that I didn’t know what he was talking about, as I was not bothering him or his friends and was simply listening to music and staring at the window. He told me “shut the f*** up you stupid f***ing white b**** if you know what’s good for you.”
I have been harassed by teenagers on Metro before, and as a rule, do not allow people to get away with treating me that way for no reason. I told him he was being rude and asked him to leave me alone.
He began threatening me, telling me how he could kill me, swearing at me, using racial slurs toward me, and telling me nobody gave a s*** about me. As soon as he threatened my life, I told him he needed to leave or I would call the police. He got angrier.
He then pulled out a lighter and started sparking it in my face.
I told him to get the lighter out of my face and leave immediately or I would call the police right then.
He laughed and got his buddies involved.
One of the teenagers apparently was shaken by what was unfolding and tried to get his buddies to leave, but they continued assaulting me. The other five surrounded me, yelling threats and racial insults in my face.
The one with the lighter kept sparking it about an inch from my eyes to threaten me. When we got close to the next stop, he shoved the lit lighter into me and tried to light my hair and clothing on fire.
When we pulled into Judiciary Square, they blocked the doors on the car, holding them open even though the doors had closed on the other cars. This enabled them to threaten me from a position where they could run back in the car to assault me if I tried to call the police or to be able to run away with the doors locking closed behind them.
With it being lunch time in DC and also cherry blossom season, the train was quite crowded. Nobody did anything to help me.
Several grown men diverted their eyes and ignored the incident altogether. I asked if anybody saw what just happened and could get off to be a witness with me, and nobody even answered me. I thought to myself, I know some of you men on this train have to have daughters, sisters, wives that you wouldn’t want this to happen to.
I got off at the next stop (Gallery Place/Chinatown), went to the station manager, and reported the incident.
Having encountered incompetent station managers in the past, I was very thankful that this particular manager was extremely helpful. He called the transit police and even offered me a chair while I waited for them to come, all the while saying how sorry he was this happened to me and how much trouble these kids were causing.
The police were also very nice and helped as much as they could, which I learned was not very much, though no fault of their own.
They told me that even if they caught these kids, there would be no repercussions for them. They said that very rarely does anybody actually intervene to help victims when they’re witnessing violence on Metro, possibly due to bystander effect or fear of retaliation.
They said they had arrested one particular teen nine separate times for burglary, auto theft, assault, and fraud and he was still walking free because of the way DC law is written for minors.
They told me how these kids target DC and Maryland rather than Virginia because Virginia laws are stricter and often land them in jail – not to mention that Virginia citizens can carry concealed weapons to defend themselves.
They also told me how horribly understaffed the transit police were and how they needed more police to adequately patrol the Metro. The most disturbing revelation was that these teens were getting their hands on guns more easily now due to a change in DC gun laws and that there was nothing stopping them from bringing them onto the Metro.
It was pointed out to me pretty bluntly that even if they were caught and arrested, these kids would then be given my information (right to face accuser) and then most likely be set free 20 minutes later with a grudge and my name and address. Even if they were convicted, they'd probably get nothing worse than probation and be sent back home.
It was gently suggested to me that it would be safer/smarter to not file so that these kids never get my info. And as a statistician, I understand that not filing an official report means that their crime goes uncounted once again, and anyone who actually has the power to change things can point at the stats and say everything is dandy. It's a lose-lose-lose.
I feel lucky to have gotten away without being physically hurt or robbed. The police were openly surprised that they hadn’t robbed or punched me.
I am struggling to understand how this can happen to me on a train full of people at 12:30 p.m. on a Thursday in a relatively decent part of the city. That’s not to say that violence at other times/locations is acceptable, but this is, in my opinion, a new and disturbing level of brazenness on the part of these thugs.
Be careful the next week or two – the cops warned that it would be particularly bad while these kids are on spring break.
MTPD: Not DC's finest (Washington Times)
Gag order on employees at odds with law (Washington Times)
What does "accessible" really mean? FixWMATA finds out.
@VeggieTart · 677 weeks ago
While this happened on Metro, this is less about Metro than about DC and Maryland laws that inadequately punish young offenders.
@FixWMATA · 677 weeks ago
http://fixwmata.com/metro-by-wheelchair
DC Denizen · 677 weeks ago
If you're assaulted like that on Metro, and the person is arrested and you go to court, the complainant is listed as the arresting officer, not you (at least this is how it works in Virginia, maybe someone could share an experience in DC or MD to see if it's consistent?). In my case, a plea bargain was struck and I never had to testify- my assailant didn't know my name and certainly not my address. Also, I was taken into the court room after him, and led out before him, so he wasn't even able to see my face.
Please file. The more information the police have, the better they're able to distinguish patterns and use their resources to everyone's best advantage. They have a special page set up to capture harrassment- and what happened to you was definitely harassment since they were calling you a bitch and using racial slurs- and I'd encourage you to fill out this form, even if you've already reported it via their phone line. Here's the page: http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/transit_police/h...
DCRider · 677 weeks ago
brian · 677 weeks ago
CF Leahy · 677 weeks ago
Luke · 677 weeks ago
You are in error referring to them as men. On behalf of my gender, I apologize. I wish I could have been there.
@Hell_on_wheelz · 677 weeks ago
Until riders start standing up for each other, the crime is going to continue. If everyone behaves like a victim then prepare for us all to be victimized.
We are truly on our own, at least from my point of view. The sooner we Get That, the sooner we start working together, the sooner we can make changes happen.
Guest · 677 weeks ago
I am extremely concerned that any woman would have to be subjected to this kind of abuse while riding public transportation.
Cait · 677 weeks ago
Anon · 677 weeks ago
Derwin · 677 weeks ago
Metro Ryder · 677 weeks ago
I hope you did file the report. The police aren't going to get more money or manpower if they don't have reports to show that it's needed.
Guest · 677 weeks ago
Driver · 677 weeks ago
Of course, what does reflect badly on Metro is that I was totally expecting the part where the station manager told you to go away and never come back. So, from the soft bigotry of low expectations comes Metro's real problem.
Katie · 677 weeks ago
Shame on all those people who looked the other way. Hopefully one day human decency will make itself apparent on metro. I won't be holding my breath though...
Guest · 677 weeks ago
AnonE · 677 weeks ago
Please keep in mind that having a Metro uniform does not give us any authority to touch, talk, yell or anything to those "kids"
F'n JD · 677 weeks ago
eric b · 677 weeks ago
rooshv 85p · 677 weeks ago
DMCinDC · 677 weeks ago
jeff · 677 weeks ago
Disillusioned · 677 weeks ago
dragnet · 677 weeks ago
"Several grown men diverted their eyes and ignored the incident altogether. I asked if anybody saw what just happened and could get off to be a witness with me, and nobody even answered me."
But I disagree with this portion here. It's not the job of men to be bodyguards for women---even if they are in trouble or physical danger. When women were released from their traditional roles of being sex objects and baby factories then men were liberated from their traditional roles of being protectors and providers. You can't have it both ways, even if you are in physical danger.
Feminism liberated women from accountability to men---but it also liberated men from responsibility to women. It's really not fair to expect men to continue to act as disposable bodyguards on behalf of women in light of everything that's happened over the last 50 years---even if you are in physical danger. Men weren't put on this earth for the benefit of women.
If you want protection, get a gun. God didn't make men and women equal, but Smith & Wesson sure as hell did.
GreenLineGirl · 677 weeks ago
psychologist · 677 weeks ago
jimlcunningham 80p · 677 weeks ago
"not to mention that Virginia citizens can carry concealed weapons to defend themselves"
This is very telling.
Fed Up Rider · 677 weeks ago
Cowards abound · 677 weeks ago
@rix0rz · 677 weeks ago
As for the OP, nice to see DCs truancy laws are working!
Anon5 · 677 weeks ago
Assault with a dangerous weapon - up to 10 years imprisonment
Disorderly Conduct - up to $500 fine and 90 days in prison
Arson - 1 to 10 years in prison
Fraud in the first degree - up to 10 years in prison, plus a fine
Per DC Code §§ 22-4001 to 22-4004, these were bias-related crimes. Therefore, all penalties are increased by up to 1.5x.
If tried as adults, they could receive 30 years prison time each just for the Assault and Arson charges.
I would definitely follow up with the police and do whatever you can to keep these dangerous thugs off the streets!
guest · 677 weeks ago
She never said she expected them to jump in and die for her. She never said that she expects men to follow her around as bodyguards and take bullets aimed at her. She never says she doesn't hold the women responsible too - in fact, she shames all riders a few times.
The fact that people - men AND women - stood by and did absolutely nothing, is disheartening. If you didn't want to physically intervene, you could have pressed the emergency button, called the police, or gotten off to be a witness with her after the kids had left and there was no threat posed to you anymore. A young woman was randomly targeted and rendered completely defenseless against these thugs while a car full of people pretended like it wasn't happening. I understand wanting to protect yourself, but have we completely abandoned decency and humanity?
Orly Taitz · 677 weeks ago
humanity · 677 weeks ago
I stand with Orly! · 677 weeks ago
@bflosenrab · 677 weeks ago
Guest · 677 weeks ago
Truth is freedom · 677 weeks ago
Something motivated you to confront a gang of people you knew to be of poor character (and angry, too). Then, when they behaved as you should have expected, you were predictably unable to handle the consequences.
That's a lot of confidence. The thing about confidence, at least in the world that men inhabit, is that you have to be prepared and able to back it up. If you can't manage the expected consequences of acting confident, you have to curb yourself.
The men on the train saw that you were not being harmed, and they knew that if they intervened there was a real chance that they could be beaten or killed. So they refrained from taking action. Thankfully, such rationality is common among men.
The memory of backing down (or not standing up) in the face of an unreasonable risk at some point in life is universal for men. It's painfully shameful because it's inconsistent with masculine nature, but it's prevalence is understandable. Prudence assures survival of the species.
Your willingness to instigate consequences you knew in advance you could not manage, however, is the opposite. It's unnatural. Nature selected people like you out of the gene pool tens of thousands of year ago. They were killed by bears whom they challenged for going all over the woods.
So something is going on with you; and with women who see your point. Modern culture has taught you something unnatural.
If I were you, I would ask myself why. What gives me the irrational confidence to antagonize a hostile stranger on the metro when I have the obvious and (for a woman) shame-free option to simply keep my mouth shut?
Guest · 677 weeks ago
Original Poster · 677 weeks ago
I am not shaming only the men on the train. I do not expect men to serve as my personal bodyguards. I am equally frustrated with all the women who ignored me. The reason I singled out grown men in reference to the attack itself is because of the six people closest to me, four were big men, one was a frail elderly lady, and one was a very young girl who looked terrified. Do I expect the men to endanger their lives to help me? No. Do I expect them to be white knights? No. Do I expect them to have more courage than an elderly woman and a young girl? Yes. They could have walked to the other end of the train and pressed the far-away emergency button. They could have called the police. And yes, they probably could have restrained the kid with the lighter if they wanted to, but I do not fault them for choosing not to do that, as I understand their concern. What I wholeheartedly fault them for, though, is refusing to even acknowledge me when I asked for help AFTER the thugs had left.
I did call the police, but I wasn't able to do it while they were holding a flame in my face. In the time it would take me to fumble through my purse, find my phone, and dial the police, they could have done serious harm to me. Also, the cops said they would have just stolen my phone if I had tried to use it during the incident itself.
To dragnet - While I agree that men aren't obligated to physically endanger themselves for me and did not intend to imply that they are, I don't appreciate your comments devolving to calling me a bitch and implying that somehow I didn't deserve to be helped in any way. You can make the point that it might not be safe for people to intervene without personally attacking me. How would you feel if you were me? Try to keep some humanity in your evaluation because remember, I am a human, and so are you. Unless you are a sociopath, I think that you also would be unsettled by experiencing or even witnessing what happened to me.
To the moron Truth is freedom, I can't even begin to tell you how stupid your comment is. I was riding the train in the middle of the day. How does that justify what these kids did to me? How did I instigate this when they were the ones that approached me? They targeted me before I said a word. They would have done the same thing regardless of what I said to them. In fact, the cops told me that standing up to them in the way I did - simply asking them to leave in a calm way - probably prevented me from being robbed or beaten up. Had I sat there and cowered, they would have seen me as weaker and an easier target and probably punched and robbed me. Given your obvious idiocy, I'd say that you are the one who should have been killed off by natural selection.
I really have no political opinion on gun laws - my only purpose in bringing this up was to relay information the police told me and to express concern at these thugs getting their hands on guns.
Thank you to everyone who has expressed support and written kind words. I am looking into whether I can file an official police report without my personal information on it in DC. Thanks to the tip from the rider from VA about using the officer as the complainant. I recently bought a home and am the only person with my name in the country, so a quick google search is all it would take for these kids to see real estate tax records pop up with my address. I know they probably are too lazy to follow through, but as a young single woman who lives alone in their hunting ground, it's not a risk I'm willing to take.
Be safe everyone.
jimlcunningham 80p · 677 weeks ago
An undercover cop could bust so much bad and/or illegal behavior in a day's work riding one of these trains that the buzz and headlines alone would be enough to deter bad behavior.
TommyBoy · 677 weeks ago
Hank · 677 weeks ago
Women, develop a repuation for respecting the kind of guys who want to help you out, and then maybe we will. Until, then, enjoy the decliine.
Good guys have learned a lesson: being honorable doesn't pay. Thank the Left for that.
Hank · 677 weeks ago
Original Poster · 677 weeks ago
As I said, had it been all women who shied away, I would have recalled the events with the same emotion, replacing the word "men" with "women" in my story. I used the word "men" instead of "adults" because I wrote the story less than 24 hours after it happened and remembered vividly looking up and seeing MEN, not mixed gender adults, actively watching my situation and then looking away when I met their eyes. It's simply a fact of who was there. I switch back to showing frustration at everyone when it's a mixture of men and women ignoring me. I referenced men having daughters/sisters/wives because that's a human element. Like I said, had it been my father, I would have said the same thing about people having fathers they wouldn't want this to happen to.
This has nothing to do with gender. The only intention I had writing my story, believe it or not, was to make other riders aware of a potential danger and discuss how we, as riders, can deal with violence on metro, not to somehow shame the entire male gender or debate feminism and gender roles.
anon · 677 weeks ago
Too bad the folks making comments turned this into a gender issue rather than focusing on the fact that you were raising awareness about the dangers of riding metro these days. I thank you very much for sharing and I will be passing this along to my fellow metro riders.
Durr · 677 weeks ago
Yet another opinion · 677 weeks ago
That said, a few points:
- I would have certainly served as a witness for her, and would have gladly escorted her to the station manager
- I may have pushed an emergency button, but, again, don't know enough about the situation. If I could have done it unnoticed, sure. But I don't know that the risk (further antagonizing them) would be worth the reward (train operator blaring through the call box asking if there was an emergency)
- The victim's not to blame, but could have handled this situation better, and may want to revisit her rule about not letting people "treat her that way". If you're not willing to turn the other cheek when people speak to you in a way you don't like, you need to be prepared to deal with the consequences.
guest · 677 weeks ago
Who's to say this would have unfolded any better had she not said anything? You don't know what these kids were after or what their motivation was in approaching her the way they did. Sure, it may have ended peacefully if she had turned the other cheek, but it also may have escalated even further. Nobody knows why these kids act the way they do in different scenarios.
ShadesofGray · 677 weeks ago
guest · 677 weeks ago
breakdown of blame:
thug kids: 100%
victim: 0%
humanity · 677 weeks ago
also, she didn't "mouth off" to a group of thugs. she asked ONE kid who was harassing her to please stop, BEFORE he got his friends involved. that's really not stupid or foolish if you consider that 2 of them had already approached her and left without giving her any problems. it also doesn't shift any blame onto her for what happened next. she says nothing about responding to them once it's become a group of them.
just sayin · 677 weeks ago
Peter · 677 weeks ago
Anon · 676 weeks ago
Anon · 676 weeks ago