Monday, February 4, 2013

Sorry Sarles

Metro GM Richard Sarles issued an rare online apology to Green Line riders in the wake of the Green Line meltdown last Wednesday. It's better than nothing, but I found a few things worth noting. They're not in any specific order.

First, why was it only addressed to Green Line riders? Yes, they had it the worst, but when a public service screws up that bad, I think all of us who fund it and have to use it should receive an apology from its leader. Wednesday night was just another example of how Metro is failing, and Sarles needs to acknowledge those failures to all riders.

Second, why weren't riders officially offered refunds? I know Metro gives them, but to depend on sporadic media reports to get the word out seems disingenuous. Metro should officially, through alerts, emails and on the website, announce it will give free ride passes to anyone who claims to have been affected. Yes, there will be some scammers, but it's worth to appear seriously sorry to riders. Better yet, why not have a free Metro weekend for everyone? The service isn't worth that much anyway, so why not engender some goodwill? Besides, the damage to the bottom line will probably be equivalent to what the Planning Department blows in a single day on Dr. Dre Beats earbuds and silly studies.

Third, where are the details? In typical Metro-ese, the whole thing is just so passive, i.e. the trains "lost power." Is that just another phenomenon? Trains just don't lose power. What happened? Also, there's no mention of the arcing insulator, which is what set this failball into motion in the first place. Level with us, Dick. I think you'd be surprised how much better Metro's image would be in the long run if people just felt Metro told the truth.

Fourth, why does the apology just say they're going to improve their response to these kinds of emergencies? Why is there not one mention about what he's going to do to ensure these kinds of incidents don't happen at all, or are incredibly rare? There's nothing about that. To me, the subtext is there are going to be lots more of these, so Metro's going try to raise the bar a little in how they react but will ignore the core problem. Of course, Metro said the same thing in July after a similar incident. Up your every day game, Metro. Then you won't have to worry about these things.

Fifth, the little nod to the D.C, Fire Department is because someone from Metro, likely the chief spokesman Dan Stessel, told the Washington Post that emergency responders (DCFD) had cut third rail power, implying much of the mess wasn't Metro's fault. From what my sources tell me, Metro is always charged with taking down third rail power for emergency responders. Sarles later admitted Metro turned the power off, but I'm sure DCFD bristled at the quote. I'm guessing this is the reason the apology was issued in the first place.

Finally, why was the mea culpa not on the front page of the Metro website? Why was it sent out as an advisory and not a news release? Why is it set to expire in a couple weeks? It should part of the permanent record.

It's not all bad though. During Thursday's afternoon rush, there was a report of Sarles at Navy Yard meeting and greeting passengers. That's a good move, and something that should be a regular part of job.

The day after issuing the apology, Sarles issued this memo to employees:
Yesterday I issued a public apology to our Green Line customers for Wednesday night’s service disruption. Although we’ve made improvements to the way we respond to incident trains, we learned that we have more work to do. I also heard stories about passengers helping each other, including one woman who graciously shared her cell phone with others so they could notify loved ones, child care providers and employers of their delay. Another customer assisted an expectant mother by carrying her toddler out of a train without power. While I have thanked the DC Fire Department and National Park Service Police for their effective assistance, I also want to thank our employees – especially bus operators – who helped customers find their way home. I received numerous customer commendations for the operator of one of the incident trains who kept his passengers calm with his reassuring tone and constant communication. This extra care for our customers is what I expect, and they deserve, so thanks to all who went the extra mile.

Have a safe and enjoyable Super Bowl week

Have fun with that.

Other items:
Watch those slippery tiles (Examiner)
More finger pointing over Silver Spring transit center (WaPo)

Comments (14)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Amen! I heard there was an apology, but I went to the Metro website and couldn't find it anywhere.

They don't seem very sorry at all.
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
Lisa, this way of business has become the norm and is seen to be acceptable to all since metro has no real authority who oversees the agency. As a result, all you will get from now to the end of time is an apology. Change will only come when there is change to who oversees the entire agency and so far there is none.
When is keeping "his passengers calm with his reassuring tone and constant communication" going the extra mile? Shouldn't that be standard service?
Re: the Sarles memo to employees.

They way read it was "you may have read a lot of bad things in the media, but we actually got a lot of commendations and some passengers behaved like human beings."

They guy can't be talking about the same Metro we all know.
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
This must be sarcasm. He must have someone writing these responses.
Who writes this crap for Sarles? They should be promoted to station manager.
Your transit agency is bad and you should feel bad!
The Truth's avatar

The Truth · 633 weeks ago

The truth is that Sarles doesn't give a crap and the "apology" is just a PR/Goodwill stunt.
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
I believe Sarles was asked to head this agency and did not know it was in such poor array. The truth be told, he did not want the job in the first place. The Agency needs a total overhall and that does not mean move around the managers it has now. Metro could be a 'world class' system again if you fire the no good yes men and women and find competent managers who have prior knowledge of getting things done on the Metro Rail. The managers in place now only do what has been done since the opening and that needs to stop. Metro needs change not more of the same rehashed or managers moved from on job to another.

First, you have to fire and hire a brand new HR Department, then you have to fire and hire new competent skilled, experienced Transportation Managers and promote from within skilled, experienced, educated employees who want the job.
I like my car's avatar

I like my car · 633 weeks ago

This shows, once again, that WMATA is reactive and not proactive.
"Customers can still get where they are going." - Stessel
UnSuck Fan's avatar

UnSuck Fan · 633 weeks ago

Of course he's sorry..... sorry, pathetic, deplorable, etc.!
Yes, Stessel most certainly blamed the DCFD for turning the power off. The tape was on NBC4 that night. I remember thinking, "Whaaaaat?" He backed off the claim two days later. When is Baghdad Bob going to be held to account?

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter