

From PC:
Last Thursday, 12 cars were damaged at Southern Ave. Metro parking during the day.
There are no cameras in the parking lot, and when I went to the Metro station booth to inform the attendant, of course both of her phones didn't work to call the Metro Police.
Plus, I still had to pay to exit the parking lot with the tow truck.
Ever and Anon · 710 weeks ago
Soylent Green Line · 710 weeks ago
Radner · 710 weeks ago
F'n JD · 710 weeks ago
governmentbasement 70p · 710 weeks ago
luddite · 710 weeks ago
RGG · 710 weeks ago
phan · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
Sam · 710 weeks ago
RGG · 710 weeks ago
Darthgeek · 710 weeks ago
James · 710 weeks ago
WTF · 710 weeks ago
Frequent red liner · 710 weeks ago
Anonerly · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
Sam · 710 weeks ago
Guest · 709 weeks ago
Tiffanie · 710 weeks ago
Brian · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
Mike · 709 weeks ago
Negligence requires four things:
1. A duty
2. Breach of that duty
3. Causation
4. Damages.
Basically you'd have to show that WMATA had a duty to protect and monitor your car, and that they breached that duty, leading to the damage to your vehicle.
Since WMATA specifically disclaims responsibility for cars parked in their lots, it might be a tough case to make.
n2deep · 710 weeks ago
Kara · 710 weeks ago
Maybe the rationale is because what was being paid for was not delivered and the owner needed to pay a garage because of that? As to the tow truck: it was never parked there and was resolving a problem WMATA was complicit in.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Radner · 710 weeks ago
It would have been a decent and human thing to let them out without paying, but the toll operator probably just didn't care or was afraid of punishment or had their own reasons (which we can all probably picture the typical embittered Metro employee not getting off their cell phone long enough to actually process that something awful has happened to one of their customers that they should act like a human being and let them out without charge like they probably do their friends and family members).
n2deep · 710 weeks ago
Radner · 710 weeks ago
Radner · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
Metro can not be sued because of "their" special sovergin immunity. It allows them to cry " Can't be sued because.... That is why they have dumb ass mgmt. who does not have to obey the law or accept consequences for anything they do. So if you think that Metro is telling you to go F yourself... believe it because they don't have to answer to you or anyone...
RGG · 710 weeks ago
Sam · 710 weeks ago
RGG · 710 weeks ago
James · 710 weeks ago
Mike · 709 weeks ago
n2deep · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
guest · 710 weeks ago
You are probably caucasian and blacks at metro pass around booklets about caucasian and why they should resent "whity" (Caucasians) especially the "whity women".
This booklet is distrubuted to the Station Managers at metro. We have one. Why ? There is a lot of hate in this area for white persons even though "we dont believe in slavery".
alkebulan · 709 weeks ago
n2deep · 709 weeks ago
and as for the "millions" stolen by the previous contractor. not true!! seems the accounting firm doing the audit failed to take into account either credit or debit transactions for the previous couple years. thus the huge discrepancies. the amount missing was very small. and did you notice how this huge 'theft" suddenly disappeared from the metro radar. hmmm
RGG · 710 weeks ago
· 710 weeks ago
F that.
Joolz · 710 weeks ago
n2deep · 710 weeks ago
Radner · 710 weeks ago
Why would you be surprised that us "ignorant" and "stupid" riders have a bad impression of Metro employees when you give off such a good, intelligent, and informed impression of yourself and your employer? You're so quick to call names but you don't think things like punctuation and basic typing skills could up your credibility?
n2deep · 709 weeks ago
i refer to the stupidity when people spout off about their perceived knowledge on how metro operates and who is responsible for what. its nice to know a lot of people know how metro operates than some of us employees do.
my being mad at people because they are upset because the phones do not work is off base. i am pissed off about my working conditions, my upper management people and a dozen other conditions. i have learned a long time ago that no one has my back and has my safety in mind but myself. i do not rely on metro for the most basic of necessities. you see metro cares about their employees about as much as they do about the riders.
guest · 710 weeks ago
Anony · 710 weeks ago
n2deep · 709 weeks ago
anon · 710 weeks ago
Is it too much to expect Metro to have cameras there? No.
What Metro should be doing is at least creating the illusion of protecting that lot. Enough that would give any would be vandal enough doubt about getting away with their crime that they might be deterred.
Obviously, with an act as brazen as this, Metro is not.
Maybe they should get Dan Stessel on it. He's a master of illusion.
In sum: I blame Metro and you won't change my mind bringing Bambi into the discussion.
Guest · 710 weeks ago
Bob · 710 weeks ago
RGG · 710 weeks ago
Radner · 710 weeks ago
Fred Smith · 710 weeks ago
Dr. Obvious · 709 weeks ago
JustTakeMyHoopty · 707 weeks ago