Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Safety Can Wait


From Seth Bergin:
How seriously does WMATA take the security of its riders?

On April 13, I reported that nearly all of the overhead lights were out on the covered side of Greenbelt platform at Prince George's Plaza Metro Station.

I took the above photo on August 7. (My apologies about the quality.)

I believe it's unrealistic to expect WMATA to respond and fix reported concerns within 24 or 48 hours (unless it poses an immediate life safety risk), but I would expect that something as simple as changing a light bulb would not take nearly four months--and counting.

With all the recent crime reports occurring at various Metro stations and parking facilities, one cannot help but wonder if inadequate lighting played a part in the perpetration of those crimes.

Adequate lighting is not only a security issue, it is also a safety issue, especially for riders with diminished eyesight or mobility.

In my opinion, it is also an aesthetic issue that makes a profound statement about the quality of service you can expect to receive when using the Metro system.

So what is the message that is being received by Metro's riders?

While I can not speak for every Metro rider, the message I have received is indifference.

My second question is this: What is the policy for the replacement of lights within Metro's facilities?

Is there a threshold that must be reached prior to action being taken?

Do 20 percent of all station lights need to be out before they are addressed? 30 percent? 40 percent?

And if that threshold isn't met, but the lights that are out are all concentrated in a specific area, do they remain out until the threshold is met?

I realize that it would be an inefficient use of resources just to change a single light that's out. I can even get on board with the notion that lighting is probably not at the top of the list while Metro is overhauling its infrastructure.

But there has to be a point where the risk to the safety and security of the riders becomes unacceptable and triggers an immediate response to rectify the situation.

I would urge my fellow riders to use the customer comment form on Metro's website to report your concerns or questions or to provide constructive feedback to Metro. It only takes a few minutes and it could positively impact you or one of your fellow riders. We cannot be part of the solution if we remain silent. I have included the direct link to Metro's customer comment form for your convenience.

http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/contact_us/ridercomment.cfm
And CC unsuckdcmetro[at]yahoo[dot]com

Other items:

Metro hiring three with the sole purpose of sending bus alerts (Examiner)

Comments (23)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
anonymous one's avatar

anonymous one · 711 weeks ago

I wonder if this will light a fire under their asses
I suspect they're leaving the lights out for a reason. It is harder to photograph or record in low light situations making it a challenge for the average rider to get proof of the trash, the rats, the sleeping employees, etc, etc.
1 reply · active 711 weeks ago
I agree that they are likely leaving the lights out for a reason, but I disagree with your reason. I don't think WMATA is that malicious. I think they are leaving the lights out simply because energy costs money. They are risking safety to save pennies. There was a story not long ago about a light in a parking garage that was out for weeks and when confronted about it, WMATA just responded "Ooops, the breaker tripped. It's back on now." I'd be they are just trying to be cheap more so than prevent people from taking pictures, etc.
you know, every time I hear the recording from Metro's head of security about "if you are in need of immediate police assistance" I always finish it in my mind with "you're out of luck".
They have only been out a few months? Most of the indoor stations I frequent have had extremely low levels of light for years.

I learned a long time ago to have my metro pass in hand before I enter the station. Because I can *never* see it in my purse, even if it is right on top.
1 reply · active 711 weeks ago
There has to be some "How many Metro workers does it take to change a light bulb?" jokes here...
3 replies · active 711 weeks ago
None. Why should they fix it when they get a raise whether or not they fix it.
What? Only two? Surely someone is to the right of the videographer :-)
They keep the lights low so the station managers can nap without all that annoying glare.
Anony Mouse's avatar

Anony Mouse · 711 weeks ago

Now you want lightbulbs changed?! Apparently, you believe in slavery.
List of devices that have been around forever but Metro can't seem to get right:
- Escalators
- Elevators
- Air Conditioners
- Light Bulbs
5 replies · active 711 weeks ago
Maybe all of these products are all WMATA's own brand? That would make sense....
-Trains
-Buses
-Fare Gates
-Radio Equipment (MTP)
If I were in charge I would fire more workers who fail to attend to their duties and fire managers who fail to oversee the workers who do not attend to their duties.
Keep it simple! There are people who want to do a good job but the managers are at fault and do not want change or suggestions.
Fortunately or unfortunately (depending on what side of the fence you fall), they are afforded many protections by their union. It's very difficult, if not impossible, to simply "fire more workers" when they are unionized.
Seth Bergin - believe it, it does take four months or more for Metro to change a light bulb. In Feb 25, 2011 I reported that a good portion of the Waterfront canopy lights were out and stated that I felt me and fellow riders safety was being compromised at the station entrance.

I waited until April 2011 to inquire about my request, because nothing had been done in the 2 months prior. I then called again in May 2011 and spoke with a representative for the Green Line and expressed my outrage at the slow pace of replacing the bulbs. I was promised (yes promised) that the situation would be resolved that week in May 2011.

Finally, in someone was sent out to survey my concerns, however they could not changed the particular buld in question.(canopy light bulb), that was done by another crew. I was livid, they have special crews to change outside light bulbs. To many cooks in the kitchen...in this case how many Metro employees does it take to change a light bulb?
1 reply · active 710 weeks ago
Seth Bergin's avatar

Seth Bergin · 710 weeks ago

You have a valid point. It seems pointless to have specialized crews that can only change certain light bulbs. If they would take the opportunity to explain why, I believe it would make sense to those of us on the outside looking in.

I did have a positive experience when reporting a prior lighting outage at Prince George's Plaza. I received a confirmation e-mail with an actual person to contact for followup. The lights were replaced within a few weeks. This time, I got a less personal confirmation e-mail, one that had a generic signature with no specific individual to contact.

In any case, I still plan to continue to report things because I maintain records of my own concerns.

Seth
please send an email here with details and it will get fixed rapavlik@wmata.com
1 reply · active 710 weeks ago
Appreciate your sharing the email address, the lights were finally replaced.
I'll keep your email address on file for future reported observations observations that go undone.
Don't you understand if there is NO Oversight there is no oversight!

Metro Managers and Upper level managers DO What ever they Want to do and only quit doing if they have stories in the News or RIDERS send in photos and evidence!

We need to oust all the offenders who earn 6 figure salaries and have no IDEA how to manage anything. NO new ideas and no education in management!!!!!!!!!

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Site Meter